The evolutionarily conserved long non‐coding RNA <i>LINC00261</i> drives neuroendocrine prostate cancer proliferation and metastasis <i>via</i> distinct nuclear and cytoplasmic mechanisms

Mather, Rebecca; Parolia, Abhijit; Carson, Sandra E.; Venalainen, Erik; Roig-Carles, David; Jaber, Mustapha; Chu, Shih-Chun; Alborelli, Ilaria; Wu, Rebecca; Lin, Dong; Nabavi, Noushin; Jachetti, Elena; Colombo, Mario P.; Xue, Hui; Pucci, Perla; Ci, Xinpei; Hawkes, Cheryl A.; Li, Yinglei; Pandha, Hardev; Ulitsky, Igor; Marconett, Crystal N.; Quagliata, Luca; Jiang, Wei; Romero, Ignacio A.; Wang, Yuzhuo; Crea, Francesco

doi:10.1002/1878-0261.12954

Cited by 26 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 54 publications

(75 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Increasing studies provide evidence that lncRNAs play considerable functional roles in tumor progression, which can be used as therapeutic targets and biomarkers for various types of cancers. 30 , 31 During the past decade, multiple lncRNAs have been reported as tumor suppressors or oncogenes in STAD, 32 such as MEG3, 33 HOTAIR, 34 and TUG1. 11 In many previous publications, TUG1 has been considered an oncogenic lncRNA, whose elevated expression was observed in diverse malignancies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Long noncoding RNA TUG1 upregulates VEGFA to enhance malignant behaviors in stomach adenocarcinoma by sponging miR‐29c‐3p

Jin

Cao

et al. 2021

Clinical Laboratory Analysis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) TUG1 has been reported to display a pivotal role in the tumorigenesis and malignant progression of various types of cancers, including stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD). However, the contribution of aberrant expression of TUG1 and the mechanism by which it serves as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) in STAD remains largely obscure. Methods The human STAD cell lines (MGC‐803 and AGS), human normal gastric epithelial cell line (GES‐1), human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T) were purchased and cultured to investigate the roles of TUG1 in STAD. Twenty BALB/c nude mice were purchased to establish a xenograft model to explore the roles of TUG1 in vivo. Results Bioinformatics analysis revealed that TUG1 was upregulated in STAD, of which expression was negatively and positively correlated with miR‐29c‐3p and VEGFA, respectively. Functional analyses indicated that TUG1 functioned as an oncogene to promote malignant behaviors (proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis) of STAD cells; whereas miR‐29c‐3p exerted the opposite role. Mechanistically, the interaction between miR‐29c‐3p with TUG1 and VEGFA was demonstrated. It was observed that miR‐29c‐3p could reverse the TUG1‐induced promotion effect on cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis in STAD. Furthermore, TUG1 overexpression promoted STAD cell proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenesis, whereas VEGFA silence restored these effects, both in vitro and in vivo. Conclusion This finding confirmed that lncRNA TUG1 acts as a ceRNA for miR‐29c‐3p to promote tumor progression and angiogenesis by upregulating VEGFA, indicating TUG1 as a therapeutic target in STAD management.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Long noncoding RNA TUG1 upregulates VEGFA to enhance malignant behaviors in stomach adenocarcinoma by sponging miR‐29c‐3p

Jin

Cao

et al. 2021

Clinical Laboratory Analysis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Expression of CHGA has been reported to be associated with prognosis in colorectal cancer (22)(23)(24), and is generally recognized as the main biomarker for neuroendocrine neoplasms (25,26). Recently, CHGA has been proposed as an early diagnosis biomarker for gastric cancer (27), prostate cancer (28), and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (29). However, there is no study about CHGA expression and early diagnosis in HCC.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A New Risk Score Based on Eight Hepatocellular Carcinoma- Immune Gene Expression Can Predict the Prognosis of the Patients

Liu²,

Li³

et al. 2021

Front. Oncol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the malignant tumors with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Immunotherapy has emerged as an increasingly important cancer treatment modality. However, the potential relationship between immune genes and HCC still needs to be explored. The purpose of this study is to construct a new prognostic risk signature to predict the prognosis of HCC patients based on the expression of immune-related genes (IRGs) and explore its potential mechanism.MethodsWe analyzed the gene expression data of 332 HCC patient samples and 46 adjacent normal tissues samples (Solid Tissue Normal including cirrhotic tissue) in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and clinical characteristics. We analyzed the gene expression data, identified differentially expressed IRGs in HCC tissues, filtered IRGs with prognostic value to construct an IRG signature, and classified patients into high and low gene expression groups based on the expression of IRGs in their tumor tissues. We also investigated the potential molecular mechanisms of IRGs through a bioinformatics approach using Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database analysis and Gene Ontology (GO) database analysis. Differentially expressed IRGs associated with significant clinical outcomes (SIRGs) were identified by univariate Cox regression analysis. An immune-related risk score model (IRRSM) was established based on Lasso Cox regression analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Based on the IRRSM, the immune score of the patients was calculated, and the patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk patients according to the median score, and the differences in survival between the two groups were compared. Then, the correlation analysis between the IRRSM and clinical characteristics was performed, and the IRRSM was validated using the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) database.ResultsThe IRRSM was eventually constructed and confirmed to be an independent prognostic model for HCC patients. The IRRSM was shown to be positively correlated with the infiltration of four types of immune cells.ConclusionOur results showed that some SIRGs have potential value for predicting the prognosis and clinical outcomes of HCC patients. IRGs affect the prognosis of HCC patients by regulating the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). This study provides a new insight for immune research and treatment strategies in HCC patients.

show abstract

“…According to previous studies, lncRNA including HOTAIR, H19, LINC00261, FENDRR, and MALAT1 could crosstalk with miRNA in NEPC. For example, HOTAIR and miR-31-5, LINC00261 and miR-8485, H19 and miR-675, FENDRR and miR-301b-3p/miR-18a-5p, and MALAT1 and miR-1 have been reported [ 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 ].…”

Section: The Interplay Between Lncrna and Mirna/epigenetic Regulators In Nepcmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Crosstalk of Long Non-Coding RNA and MicroRNA in Castration-Resistant and Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: Their Interaction and Clinical Importance

Lin

et al. 2021

IJMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prostate cancer is featured by its heterogeneous nature, which indicates a different prognosis. Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a hallmark of the treatment-refractory stage, and the median survival of patients is only within two years. Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is an aggressive variant that arises from de novo presentation of small cell carcinoma or treatment-related transformation with a median survival of 1–2 years from the time of diagnosis. The epigenetic regulators, such as long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs), have been proven involved in multiple pathologic mechanisms of CRPC and NEPC. LncRNAs can act as competing endogenous RNAs to sponge miRNAs that would inhibit the expression of their targets. After that, miRNAs interact with the 3’ untranslated region (UTR) of target mRNAs to repress the step of translation. These interactions may modulate gene expression and influence cancer development and progression. Otherwise, epigenetic regulators and genetic mutation also promote neuroendocrine differentiation and cancer stem-like cell formation. This step may induce neuroendocrine prostate cancer development. This review aims to provide an integrated, synthesized overview under current evidence to elucidate the crosstalk of lncRNAs with miRNAs and their influence on castration resistance or neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer. Notably, we also discuss the mechanisms of lncRNA–miRNA interaction in androgen receptor-independent prostate cancer, such as growth factors, oncogenic signaling pathways, cell cycle dysregulation, and cytokines or other transmembrane proteins. Conclusively, we underscore the potential of these communications as potential therapeutic targets in the future.

show abstract

The evolutionarily conserved long non‐coding RNA LINC00261 drives neuroendocrine prostate cancer proliferation and metastasis via distinct nuclear and cytoplasmic mechanisms

Cited by 26 publications

References 54 publications

Long noncoding RNA TUG1 upregulates VEGFA to enhance malignant behaviors in stomach adenocarcinoma by sponging miR‐29c‐3p

Long noncoding RNA TUG1 upregulates VEGFA to enhance malignant behaviors in stomach adenocarcinoma by sponging miR‐29c‐3p

A New Risk Score Based on Eight Hepatocellular Carcinoma- Immune Gene Expression Can Predict the Prognosis of the Patients

The Crosstalk of Long Non-Coding RNA and MicroRNA in Castration-Resistant and Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: Their Interaction and Clinical Importance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About