2017
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170975
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of giant flightless birds and novel phylogenetic relationships for extinct fowl (Aves, Galloanseres)

Abstract: The extinct dromornithids, gastornithids and phorusrhacids are among the most spectacular birds to have ever lived, with some giants exceeding 500 kg. The affinities and evolution of these and other related extinct birds remain contentious, with previous phylogenetic analyses being affected by widespread convergence and limited taxon sampling. We address these problems using both parsimony and tip-dated Bayesian approaches on an expansive taxon set that includes all key extinct flightless and flighted (e.g. Ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(206 reference statements)
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…can sometimes be misleading, a fact becoming increasingly apparent with the availability of 449 increasing amounts of molecular data (Lee and Palci 2015). Stratigraphic data provides an 450 opportunity to identify probable convergent evolution in clades widely separated by time, a point 451 that has already been demonstrated in tip-dated phylogenetic analyses of palaeognath birds 452 (Worthy et al 2017) and gharials (Lee and Yates 2018). 453…”
Section: When Will Stratigraphic Data Overrule Morphological Data? 380mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…can sometimes be misleading, a fact becoming increasingly apparent with the availability of 449 increasing amounts of molecular data (Lee and Palci 2015). Stratigraphic data provides an 450 opportunity to identify probable convergent evolution in clades widely separated by time, a point 451 that has already been demonstrated in tip-dated phylogenetic analyses of palaeognath birds 452 (Worthy et al 2017) and gharials (Lee and Yates 2018). 453…”
Section: When Will Stratigraphic Data Overrule Morphological Data? 380mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mayr [2] previously noted that few osteological similarities are shared between Steatornithidae and Nyctibiidae, despite recent molecular analyses suggesting a close relationship between these two groups. In some cases, such as the absence of the distal interosseous canal of the tarsometatarsus (the sole morphological synapomorphy identified for a (Podargidae + Daedalornithes) clade), potential synapomorphies characterizing deep divergences in Strisores are also widespread among other crown-birds [2,79] and cannot be considered uniquely diagnostic of the clades recovered by our analyses. Furthermore, some synapomorphies of Strisores identified by our and previous studies (such as the very short bill and the deep transverse sulcus of the humerus) [80,81] are not present in podargids, as previously pointed out by Mayr [4].…”
Section: Conflict Between Molecular and Morphological Datamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The codings for newly‐added outgroup taxa Megapodius reinwardt and Lithornis promiscuus were prepared generally using Houde () and Worthy et al . (), but comparative skeletal collection of PIN and fossil material stored in USNM were also consulted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We added additional primitive taxa Lithornis promiscuus and Megapodius reinwardt (see Worthy et al . ; ) in order to better polarize character states. Lithornis promiscuus was used as the outgroup.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%