The Evolution of a Contested Concept: A Meta‐Analysis of Social Capital Definitions and Trends (1988–2006)*

Abstract

This paper offers a meta-analysis that traces the contested meaning and use of social capital in sociological research over the last 18 years by focusing on journal article definitions. We identify six common definitions in use that closely correspond to the original-and in some cases, independent-formulations offered by Hanifan, Putnam, Coleman, Bourdieu, and Granovetter. Drawing from Kuhnian theory, we contend that these definitions illuminate deep divisions between those who understand social capital as a normative "cure-all" (Portes 1998)-in the tradition of Hanifan, Putnam, and Coleman -and those who view it as a resource-in the tradition of Bourdieu and Granovetterthat may be used to create or maintain social inequality. The transition of social capital from preparadigm to paradigm status may potentially involve an integration of these approaches, but this will require greater consideration of power and inequality on the part of normative theorists, who are currently dominating the debate.

The Associations Between Online Media Use and Users’ Perceived Social Resources: A Meta-Analysis

“…Accordingly, an overwhelming number of studies on the topic have been conducted, revealing often conflicting findings (Fulkerson & Thompson, 2008). The problem of divergent research results emerges (among other reasons) because both PSR and OMU are concepts that are widely used, but that remain vague terminologies.…”

Neighborhood Institutions, Facilities, and Public Space: A Missing Link for Hope VI Residents' Development of Social Capital?

“…Other social capital research has focused on aggregate levels of trust and civic engagement (Putnam, 2000), or has highlighted the informal social control that can be generated from social capital (Sampson, Raudenbush, and Earls, 1997). Although definitions of social capital are widely debated (see Fulkerson and Thompson, 2008;Portes, 1998;Portes and Landolt, 2000), in this article we define social capital as the actual or potential resources that can be accessed through social relationships where TNR are established. Therefore, social ties and trust are not social capital but, rather, are the prerequisites for social capital.…”

A Qualidade do Capital Social com Stakeholders: Fator de Desenvolvimento Espúrio ou Sustentável

“…Ao final da primeira década dos anos 2000, a teoria do capital social parecia estar se tornando um paradigma na ampla comunidade de cientistas sociais (Fulkerson & Thompson, 2008). Na área de administração no Brasil, alguns pesquisadores têm se dedicado a investigar o capital social.…”