1934
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1934.72750480006011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evaluation of Serodiagnostic Tests for Syphilis in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1937
1937
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EQA programs were first introduced in the United States in 1935 when the U.S. Department of Public Health offered a program for syphilis testing. 2 The College of American Pathologists offered the first U.S. program addressing coagulation in 1960 and reported in 1963. 3 The development of that program is detailed in another article in this issue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EQA programs were first introduced in the United States in 1935 when the U.S. Department of Public Health offered a program for syphilis testing. 2 The College of American Pathologists offered the first U.S. program addressing coagulation in 1960 and reported in 1963. 3 The development of that program is detailed in another article in this issue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1930s, 9 the need for interlaboratory standardization for public health programs led to early efforts at EQA. The concept of an unknown specimen being sent from a central EQA agency to the laboratory for testing with the results sent back to the agency for evaluation added an important new level of assurance for the quality of analysis.…”
Section: External Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation studies of serologic tests for syphilis have been conducted in the United States by the Public Health Service since 1935. The first Public Health Service evaluation study (1) was made to determine the reliability of several serologic tests for syphilis then in use in this country. All authors of tests or those who had modi¬ fied preexisting procedures were invited to par¬ ticipate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%