The Evaluation of ICP OES for the Determination of Potentially Toxic Elements in Lipsticks: Health Risk Assessment

Mrmošanin, Jelena; Pavlović, Aleksandra; Mitić, Snežana S.; Tošić, Snežana B.; Pecev‐Marinković, Emilija; Krstić, Jovana; Nikolić, Milena

doi:10.17344/acsi.2018.4800

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If the value HQ ≤ 1 then no adverse health effects (no risk); if HQ ≥ 1 (Mrmošanin et al, 2019). The HQs of investigated elements ranged from 4.46E-02 to 1.61E-01 and from 3.79E-07 to 2.56E-06, for the lipsticks and face foundation, respectively, and for all samples were below 1.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Toxic elements determination in selected cosmetic products: Health risk assessment

Đogo-Mračević,

Laketić,

Stanković

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this research was to determine the content of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and nickel (Ni) in selected lipsticks and face foundations of different countries of origin and price categories, as well as the assessment of health risk associated with these metals via dermal and oral exposure. The samples were prepared by acid digestion and then analyzed by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS) – Cd, Pb and Ni and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS) – As. Arsenic was found in 50% of lipstick samples and in only two face foundation samples with the highest concentration of 0.28 mg/kg in the lipstick sample, the lead concentration was in the range of 1.15 to 5.12 mg/kg in ten samples. Nickel was found in five samples out of 20, with the highest concentration of 4.20 mg/kg. Cadmium was found in only one face foundation sample in the cheaper price range (1.11 mg/kg). The obtained results indicate that concentrations of As, Pb, Cd, and Ni were within the permissible limits according to Serbian legislation. Health risk associated with these elements was assessed as non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risk. Obtained hazard quotients (HQs) and hazard indexes (HIs) were below 1, indicating the absence of significant non-carcinogenic health risk due to exposure to these TEs. The carcinogenic risk results show that investigated cosmetic products can be considered low–risky due to the possibility of causing malignant disease.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Toxic elements determination in selected cosmetic products: Health risk assessment

Đogo-Mračević,

Laketić,

Stanković

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, there are many other studies carried out to estimate the level of heavy metals in cosmetics (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). These studies use different techniques like UV-VIS & microfluidic Paper-based analytical device platform (µPADs) (25), inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) (26), inductively coupled plasma opticalemission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) (27), laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) (28), X-ray fluorescence (XRD) (29), graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) (21), and including flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) (30) to evaluate the concentration of toxic metals in cosmetics. Table 1 shows a comparison between the proposed method (AAS) and other methods.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health Risk Assessment of Some Heavy Metals in Lipsticks Sold in Local Markets in Iraq

MOHAMMED

AHMED²,

ORAİBİ

2023

Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Heavy metals found in cosmetics are a safety threat to the health of consumers. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the levels of heavy metals such as cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), and arsenic (As) in lipstick makeup. The level of heavy metals in lipstick was discovered by using an analytical technique with high selectivity and sensitivity, namely atomic absorption spectrometry. Twenty lipsticks were selected from the same brands, yet differing in price. Ten original (expensive) and ten knockoff (cheap) lipsticks were chosen from shops in Diyala, Iraq. The detection-limit (LOD) was in between 0.01 and 0.1, the quantification-limit (LOQ) was within 0.03 and 0.33, the recovery values (Rec.%) ranged from 100.17% to 101.1%, the RE values were 0.81%, and the RSD values were 1.33%. The results also revealed that the levels of metals are in the order of Pb > Cd > Zn > Cu > As > Cr. However, the levels of heavy metals that were estimated in this study were less than the permissible limit set by the executive authorities, so there seems to be no concern associated with these heavy metals. However, the daily and frequent use of lipstick by women exposes them to low levels of toxic metals as these metals accumulate over time and pose adverse effects on the health of the users. The results of the hazard quotient (HQ) and health risk index (HI) indicate there was no harmful effect on human health related to heavy metals present in lipstick. Whereas the results of the biological activity of the samples indicated that there was no bacterial growth in expensive samples, cheap samples were contaminated with some types of organisms; this indicates poor quality.

show abstract

“…Also, a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations are associated with iron overwhelms in cells that lead to the increase of iron toxicity including neurodegenerative diseases, anaemia, diabetes and cardiovascular disease 15,16 . Extensive screening of literature was carried out on the analysis of iron levels in different lipstick and a variety of analytical techniques have been published including Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) [17][18][19][20][21][22] , and Inductivity Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrophotometer(ICP-OES) 9,23 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Iron (II) Determination in Lipstick Samples using Spectrophotometric and Microfluidic Paper-based Analytical Device (µPADs) Platform via Complexation Reaction with Iron Chelator 1, 10-phenanthroline: A Comparative Study

Abdulkareem

Abdulsattar

2022

Baghdad Sci.J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was undertaken to introduce a fast, accurate, selective, simple and environment-friendly colorimetric method to determine iron (II) concentration in different lipstick brands imported or manufactured locally in Baghdad, Iraq. The samples were collected from 500-Iraqi dinars stores to establish routine tests using the spectrophotometric method and compared with a new microfluidic paper-based analytical device (µPAD) platform as an alternative to cost-effective conventional instrumentation such as Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS). This method depends on the reaction between iron (II) with iron(II) selective chelator 1, 10-phenanthroline(phen) in the presence of reducing agent hydroxylamine (HOA) and sodium acetate (NaOAc) buffer to yield a reddish/orange colour change proportional to the iron(II) concentration measured at λ max = 510 nm. Under optimum conditions, the calibration curve was linear in the range between (0.5-150) mg L -1 with a limit of detection of 0.09 mg L -1 . Compared to a spectrophotometric detection method, µPAD measured colour intensity using captured images using Samsung mobile phone and image J program to give proof of concept that µPAD platform fulfils the purpose of accuracy and at the same time remaining cost-effective and simplistic to be used in both developing and developed countries gave same linear calibration curve with a limit of detection 0.12 mg L -1 . ANOVA test was used to compare the proposed method results with conventional method results showing the method was accepted. The antimicrobial activity showed no significant effect from lipstick samples on tested microbes.

show abstract

The Evaluation of ICP OES for the Determination of Potentially Toxic Elements in Lipsticks: Health Risk Assessment

Cited by 4 publications

References 32 publications

Toxic elements determination in selected cosmetic products: Health risk assessment

Toxic elements determination in selected cosmetic products: Health risk assessment

Health Risk Assessment of Some Heavy Metals in Lipsticks Sold in Local Markets in Iraq

Iron (II) Determination in Lipstick Samples using Spectrophotometric and Microfluidic Paper-based Analytical Device (µPADs) Platform via Complexation Reaction with Iron Chelator 1, 10-phenanthroline: A Comparative Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About