2022
DOI: 10.7554/elife.76003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The enteric nervous system of the C. elegans pharynx is specified by the Sine oculis-like homeobox gene ceh-34

Abstract: Overarching themes in the terminal differentiation of the enteric nervous system, an autonomously acting unit of animal nervous systems, have so far eluded discovery. We describe here the overall regulatory logic of enteric nervous system differentiation of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans that resides within the foregut (pharynx) of the worm. A C. elegans homolog of the Drosophila Sine oculis homeobox gene, ceh-34, is expressed in all 14 classes of interconnected pharyngeal neurons from their birth through… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the set of neurons that co-express the homeodomain protein CEH-34 and the set of neurons that co-express the homeodomain protein UNC-42 share more molecular similarities among themselves than with other neuron classes (Fig.1B). This is particularly notable because both the UNC-42(+) and CEH-34(+) neurons are synaptically more interconnected than expected by chance (Berghoff et al, 2021; Vidal et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the set of neurons that co-express the homeodomain protein CEH-34 and the set of neurons that co-express the homeodomain protein UNC-42 share more molecular similarities among themselves than with other neuron classes (Fig.1B). This is particularly notable because both the UNC-42(+) and CEH-34(+) neurons are synaptically more interconnected than expected by chance (Berghoff et al, 2021; Vidal et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, absences of defects are not straight-forward to interpret for multiple reasons: First, because our cell fate marker analysis only usually tested a small number of markers, one cannot exclude that other markers would show a defect in expression. Second, in several previously documented cases, even unrelated homeobox genes from different subfamilies (e.g., LIM, POU) can act redundantly in neuron identity specification (Vidal et al, 2022; Zhang et al, 2014). For example, neither ttx-3 nor unc-86 single mutants affect expression of several different differentiation markers of the NSM neurons, but in a ttx-3; unc-86 double mutants these markers are completely lost (Zhang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations