2004
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.140.6.745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The End of the Sunscreen and Melanoma Controversy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, two separate reviews failed to find correlations between sunscreen use and melanoma risk. [48][49][50] While sun protection is still recommended, its benefit may vary because of the role of individual genetic factors in melanoma development. 51 The multifactorial nature of melanoma may partly explain the inconsistent associations found between sunscreen use and melanoma development.…”
Section: Photocarcinogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, two separate reviews failed to find correlations between sunscreen use and melanoma risk. [48][49][50] While sun protection is still recommended, its benefit may vary because of the role of individual genetic factors in melanoma development. 51 The multifactorial nature of melanoma may partly explain the inconsistent associations found between sunscreen use and melanoma development.…”
Section: Photocarcinogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the extremely small size of the nanoparticles being used, there is a concern that they may be able to cross cellular membranes and interact directly with macromolecules such as DNA 12,17,56 . A late cytotoxic action of ZnO sunscreen in skin, as suggested in the present study, may be associated with adverse effects when sunscreen users increase time spent in the sun 6,56,57 . The small quantity of Zn 2+ that accumulates in the space between the sunscreen film and skin may be enough to cause detrimental action and may pose long‐term health risks over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…[7][8][9] A quick hand search of the 59 original studies published in the 2007 Archives of Dermatology showed that there were 25 (42%) retrospective and prospective cohort studies, 4 (7%) crosssectional studies, and 9 (16%) case series. In dermatology, the controversies about sunscreen use and melanoma risk, the treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis with intravenous ␥-globulins, and isotretinoininduced suicide illustrate the potential of invalid inferences from observational studies that fail to adhere to recommendations such as STROBE.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%