2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electrical conductivity and electromagnetic interference shielding of injection molded multi-walled carbon nanotube/polystyrene composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
155
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
155
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on carbon black properties percolation thresholds in polycarbonate matrix were found to be from 5 to 10 w% [9], and SE values of 10 dB for carbon black/rubber composites were measured at loadings higher than 30 w% [4]. Concerning CSCNT, their high electrical conductivity together with high aspect ratio (ratio of length to diameter is more than 20) and uniform dispersion in the PMMA can lead to formation of conducting network even at very low loadings (less than 1 w%), in the same way as was observed for MWCNT [5,10] and SWCNT [9], and as a result to the higher SE. Comparing to the data for MWCNT / polypropylene composites, reported in [5], the values of SE measured in the present work for CSCNT/PMMA composites are lower, that can be explained by lower electrical conductivity of CSCNT in comparison with MWCNT, but this requires additional studies.…”
Section: Compositesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Depending on carbon black properties percolation thresholds in polycarbonate matrix were found to be from 5 to 10 w% [9], and SE values of 10 dB for carbon black/rubber composites were measured at loadings higher than 30 w% [4]. Concerning CSCNT, their high electrical conductivity together with high aspect ratio (ratio of length to diameter is more than 20) and uniform dispersion in the PMMA can lead to formation of conducting network even at very low loadings (less than 1 w%), in the same way as was observed for MWCNT [5,10] and SWCNT [9], and as a result to the higher SE. Comparing to the data for MWCNT / polypropylene composites, reported in [5], the values of SE measured in the present work for CSCNT/PMMA composites are lower, that can be explained by lower electrical conductivity of CSCNT in comparison with MWCNT, but this requires additional studies.…”
Section: Compositesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…For example, in the traditional injection molding, the process parameters significantly influence the electrical conductivity of molded composites [26]. Additionally, in 3D printing, FDM produces 3D objects by extruding thermoplastic materials and depositing the semi-molten materials onto a stage layer by layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above a critical frequency, electron hopping is no longer the dominant mechanism but conductivity results from Resistive-Capacitive (RC) coupling between filler and matrix, which can be described by equivalent circuits [5,[25][26][27]. EMI shielding CNT-based polymer nanocomposites based on, for example, polycarbonate, polycaprolactone, polypropylene and polystyrene have already been described [20,21,[28][29][30]. They still mostly work by reflection, not absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%