2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The EICAT+ framework enables classification of positive impacts of alien taxa on native biodiversity

Abstract: Species introduced through human-related activities beyond their native range, termed alien species, have various impacts worldwide. The IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) is a global standard to assess negative impacts of alien species on native biodiversity. Alien species can also positively affect biodiversity (for instance, through food and habitat provisioning or dispersal facilitation) but there is currently no standardized and evidence-based system to classify positive impac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While IAS may themselves provide NCP such as food, timber, protection against soil erosion and water puri cation, we limited our analysis to negative impacts because we focus on a set of IAS that are prioritised for management in Europe, which means that their deleterious impacts are considered to far outweigh any bene cial outcome. In addition, bene ts of IAS are not yet systematically reviewed in risk assessments 18 . In the future, the systematic description and evaluation of bene ts provided by IAS on NCP can help to identify con icts of interests and advance dialogue among stakeholders 19 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While IAS may themselves provide NCP such as food, timber, protection against soil erosion and water puri cation, we limited our analysis to negative impacts because we focus on a set of IAS that are prioritised for management in Europe, which means that their deleterious impacts are considered to far outweigh any bene cial outcome. In addition, bene ts of IAS are not yet systematically reviewed in risk assessments 18 . In the future, the systematic description and evaluation of bene ts provided by IAS on NCP can help to identify con icts of interests and advance dialogue among stakeholders 19 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An IAS having a positive impact on one organism does not necessarily mean that it will be beneficial to others (Vimercati et al 2022). However, using IAS to improve human livelihoods often ignores the requirements of a broad spectrum of other life forms that are directly or indirectly affected by the IAS.…”
Section: Benefits But At What Cost?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While value judgements can be placed in the discussion sections of articles (e.g., Jachuła et al 2019), a dedicated section for such judgements might be more effective in terms of drawing readers' attention. Importantly, this section should not be viewed as representing a caveat of the study; instead, the value judgements of the authors should complement the study's findings to provide a more complete pictures of the IAS in question (Vimercati et al 2022). Journal editors and reviewers should also encourage authors' engagement with this practice.…”
Section: Road Aheadmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Invasive species are recognized as one of the major environmental problems worldwide and responsible for a myriad of impacts on ecosystems and ecosystem processes. Although many invasive species exert a range of detrimental effects a more nuanced approach is now emerging, which acknowledges that they can make a positive or beneficial contribution (Schlaepfer et al, 2011;Vimercati et al, 2020Vimercati et al, , 2022Mantoani et al, 2022). Clearly, a positive impact may not always be beneficial (Vimercati et al, 2022) and nutrient enrichment due the introduction of an alien nitrogen-fixing plant species, for instance, could result in the loss of important resident species with low nutrient requirements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%