1960
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1960.00740010803014
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The Efficiency of Binaural Listening Among the Hearing-Impaired

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
15
1
0
0

Citation Types

0
3
0
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
16

Relationship

0
16

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 16 publications

(3 citation statements)
references

References 7 publications

0
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the experimental studies so far published on binaural hearing aids deal solely with speech facilitation in noise, and their results are about evenly divided. Markle and Aber (1958), Belzile and Markle (1959), Wright and Carhart (1960) and Olsen and Carhart (1967), for example, reported in favour of binaural hearing aids, while Hedgecock and Sheets (1958), DiCarlo and Brown (1960), and Jerger et ah (1961) did not find any significant difference between binaural and monaural hearing aid use with regard to speech facilitation.…”
Section: Binaural Hearing Aidsmentioning
confidence: 98%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Most of the experimental studies so far published on binaural hearing aids deal solely with speech facilitation in noise, and their results are about evenly divided. Markle and Aber (1958), Belzile and Markle (1959), Wright and Carhart (1960) and Olsen and Carhart (1967), for example, reported in favour of binaural hearing aids, while Hedgecock and Sheets (1958), DiCarlo and Brown (1960), and Jerger et ah (1961) did not find any significant difference between binaural and monaural hearing aid use with regard to speech facilitation.…”
Section: Binaural Hearing Aidsmentioning
confidence: 98%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Given the benefits of binaural listening for improving SNR, it might be expected that a binaural hearing aid fitting would result in better speech-in-noise recognition performance, when compared to a monaural fitting. Indeed, as reviewed by Ross (1980), there are several early studies that support the assumption that there will be better speech recognition performance with the use of two hearing aids as compared to one (e.g., Markle and Aber, 1958;Belzile and Markle, 1959;Wright and Carhart, 1960;Olsen and Carhart, 1967). On the other hand, there are also early studies that suggest no difference in monaural versus binaural speech recognition in noise performance (Hedgecock and Sheets, 1958;DiCarlo and Brown, 1960;Jerger and Dirks, 1961).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Past research on binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners was mainly focused on clinical application as site-of-lesion test (Olsen et al, 1976;Bocca and Antonelli, 1976;Stubblefield and Goldstein, 1977), on the determination of the benefit of binaural hearing aids (Wright and Carhart, 1960;Dirks and Wilson, 1969b;Zelnick, 1970;Markides, 1977;Festen and Plomp, 1986) or on age-related effects (Tillman et al, 1973;Duquesnoy, 1983; Gelfland e! al., 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.