1979
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7357(79)90013-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficiency and clash load of impact forming machines to the second order of approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two degrees of freedom models are commonly used in the literature to describe hammers [5,11,15,17]. These models are good tools for predicting forging variables and blow efficiency, supporting the choice of a two degrees of freedom model in the present study.…”
Section: Identification Of the Model And Its Parametersmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Two degrees of freedom models are commonly used in the literature to describe hammers [5,11,15,17]. These models are good tools for predicting forging variables and blow efficiency, supporting the choice of a two degrees of freedom model in the present study.…”
Section: Identification Of the Model And Its Parametersmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…With only the measurement of the load signal, the impact velocity, the friction coefficient, and the material characteristics for one blow, it is possible to determine a model and its associated parameters. Dynamic models for forging machines were developed for laboratory drop hammer [7], single-acting hammer [5] and industrial hammers by focusing on foundation behaviour [11]. However, model parameters were not determined from experimental measurements and do not consider the specificities of the machine.…”
Section: Identification Of the Model And Its Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Major areas of application of this method are open‐die forging and closed‐die forging. However, the research works relating to this process have remained rather limited[2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. With the intention of analysing the impact forging process, the implicit type of rigid‐plastic finite element codes[8], which are commonly used in metal forming analysis, can be applied to the analysis, but most metal forming analyses using these codes are restricted to cases with constant die velocity and they cannot provide sufficient information about the complex dynamic phenomena such as contact and separation between the workpiece and the dies during impact operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%