2008
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2008.92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of the genetic background on herbicide resistance fitness cost and its associated dominance in Arabidopsis thaliana

Abstract: The advantage of the resistance conferred by a mutation can sometimes be offset by a high fitness-cost penalty. This balance will affect possible fate of the resistance allele. Few studies have explored the impact of the genetic background on the expression of the resistance fitness cost and none has attempted to measure the variation in fitnesscost dominance. However, both the fitness penalty and its dominance may modify evolutionary trajectory and outcome. Here the impact of Arabidopsis thaliana intraspecifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple segregation crosses: Another method that enables the evaluation of the influence of the genetic background on variations in the magnitude and expression of resistance costs consists of pairing either the same resistant line (RR or resistant) with different SS (or susceptible) plants collected from different environments (locations, regions and so on) (Paris et al, 2008) or multiple RS plants for a particular resistance allele, but originated from different populations (Menchari et al, 2008). By analysing the same 2,4-D herbicide resistance mutation in eight different segregating genetic backgrounds, Paris et al (2008) report that the fitness cost of a resistance gene is variable depending on the local genetic composition.…”
Section: Methodological Approaches To Control For Genetic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Multiple segregation crosses: Another method that enables the evaluation of the influence of the genetic background on variations in the magnitude and expression of resistance costs consists of pairing either the same resistant line (RR or resistant) with different SS (or susceptible) plants collected from different environments (locations, regions and so on) (Paris et al, 2008) or multiple RS plants for a particular resistance allele, but originated from different populations (Menchari et al, 2008). By analysing the same 2,4-D herbicide resistance mutation in eight different segregating genetic backgrounds, Paris et al (2008) report that the fitness cost of a resistance gene is variable depending on the local genetic composition.…”
Section: Methodological Approaches To Control For Genetic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By analysing the same 2,4-D herbicide resistance mutation in eight different segregating genetic backgrounds, Paris et al (2008) report that the fitness cost of a resistance gene is variable depending on the local genetic composition. The study provides evidence for the existence of compensatory genes that are segregating in different genetic backgrounds (see below Compensatory evolution of resistance costs).…”
Section: Methodological Approaches To Control For Genetic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, the expression of transgenes depends on the genetic background (Bravo et al, 2007;Paris et al, 2008), and the physiological and environmental conditions (Lepri et al, 2002;Mahon et al, 2002;Olsen et al, 2005). The stability, inheritance and expression of transgenes in subsequent generations of breeding are of paramount importance for functional analysis as well as for crop improvement (Dietz-Pfeilstetter and Kirchner, 1998;Kathuria et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%