2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(99)00129-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of temporal bone on transcranial Doppler ultrasound beam shape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The US field refraction induced by bone has been the subject of many studies (for some examples see: Moehring and Ritcey (1996), Deverson et al (2000) and Evans (2006) and our work complementing these previous studies. This research has been crucial because it has been shown by Girault et al (2010) that microembolus trajectories depend on both the shape of the US beam and the spatial velocity distribution.…”
Section: Mapping Of the Pressure Fieldsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The US field refraction induced by bone has been the subject of many studies (for some examples see: Moehring and Ritcey (1996), Deverson et al (2000) and Evans (2006) and our work complementing these previous studies. This research has been crucial because it has been shown by Girault et al (2010) that microembolus trajectories depend on both the shape of the US beam and the spatial velocity distribution.…”
Section: Mapping Of the Pressure Fieldsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…When the middle cerebral artery is viewed from the temporal bone, the blood flow is mainly parallel to the ultrasound beam axis. A detailed discussion of the influence of the temporal bone on the ultrasound (US) beam is presented in Deverson et al (2000). However, we showed in this study that, although the US beam was attenuated and distorted, the radiation force induced was sufficient to move microbubbles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Transcranial ultrasonic brain imaging of adults is also limited by the inhomogeneous aberrating effect of the skull bone. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The skull bone induces both phase and amplitude distortions. Such distortions can be potentially corrected by various methods, such as adaptive focusing, 10 time reversal, 11 dynamic focusing, 12 and spatiotemporal inverse filter ͑STIF͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beam refraction, reduction in beam width, multiple regions of high intensities within the same soundfield and wide ranges of energy losses in different skull samples occur (Fry and Barger 1978;Grolimund 1986;White et al 1978). The distortion effects as a result of insonation through temporal bone are variable and unpredictable and their appearance seem to be independent from the ultrasound device itself (Deverson et al 2000). Substantial work on trans-skull phase distortion and signal absorption has been done (Aarnio et al 2005;White et al 2005White et al , 2006Yin and Hynynen 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%