2019
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2018-0345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of sample plot selection strategy and the number of sample plots on inoptimality losses in forest management planning based on airborne laser scanning data

Abstract: In forest management planning, errors in predicted stand attributes might lead to suboptimal decisions that result in decreased net present value (NPV). Forest inventory data will have higher value if the amount of suboptimal decisions can be decreased. Therefore, the value of information can be measured through the decrease in inoptimality losses, which are the NPV differences between the optimal and suboptimal decisions. In this study, four alternative sample plot selection strategies with different numbers … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though additional improvements can be made to our estimates of forest characteristics, tradeoffs between processing, model development, and sampling costs related to improvements in accuracy should be weighed to evaluate the level of precision needed to inform decision making [34]. Given the amount of model error potentially introduced by co-registration errors [20], our EGAMs explained the majority of the variation that can be accounted for within the field data and provide a substantial improvement over previous efforts [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though additional improvements can be made to our estimates of forest characteristics, tradeoffs between processing, model development, and sampling costs related to improvements in accuracy should be weighed to evaluate the level of precision needed to inform decision making [34]. Given the amount of model error potentially introduced by co-registration errors [20], our EGAMs explained the majority of the variation that can be accounted for within the field data and provide a substantial improvement over previous efforts [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, other a-priori information, such as the geographical location and site type can be used for sample plot selection (Maltamo et al 2011). However, it has also been shown that if the number of sample plots is too small, the prediction accuracy is reduced, which will lead to suboptimal decisions in forest planning (Ruotsalainen et al 2019). The most cost-efficient method in an ALS-based inventory is to use ALS and field training data from former inventory projects for model fitting.…”
Section: Prediction Of Forest Attributes Without New In-situ Field Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of an ABA-based forest inventory depends on the precision and the coverage of the field-measured sample plot data (Maltamo et al 2011;White et al 2013;Ruotsalainen et al 2019). Moreover, the selection strategy of reference plots directly affects the value of the forest inventory data in decision-making (Ruotsalainen et al 2019).…”
Section: Measuring Forest Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%