1985
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(85)90069-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of progabide (SL 76002) on locomotor activity and conditioned place preference induced by d-Amphetamine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of amphetamine (Di Scala et al, 1985). However, it is difficult to compare this finding to the present as there were differences in rat strains, GABAergic compounds and drugs used to elicit CPP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…of amphetamine (Di Scala et al, 1985). However, it is difficult to compare this finding to the present as there were differences in rat strains, GABAergic compounds and drugs used to elicit CPP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…For example, progabide attenuates the locomotor effects of cocaine but does not effect cocaine's influence on CPP (Di Scala et al 1985). Conversely, haloperidol attenuates the locomotor stimulation produced by methylphenidate, but does not affect the CPP produced by the drug (Mithani et al 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Di Scala et al (1985) found that progabide attenuated the locomotor stimulant effect of amphetamine without affecting CPP learning. Similarly, Mithani et al (1986) were able to dissociate the inhibitory effects of haloperidol on locomotor stimulant effects of methylphenidate from its failure to block a CPP produced by methylphenidate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although there is a relationship between drugs that produce CPP and increased activity, some studies have dissociated these effects. Di Scala et al (1985) found that the GABA mimetic drug progabide attenuated the locomotor stimulant effect of amphetamine but did not influence the CPP produced by the drug. Similarly, Mithani et al (1986) found that the dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol greatly attenuated the locomotor stimulation produced by methylphenidate, but did not affect the CPP prouced by this drug.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%