Housing and feeding are integral to calf rearing, and must meet calf needs while remaining functional for the farmer. This study compared health, behaviour, growth and labour requirements of calves housed in groups indoors and fed via an automatic or manual milk feeding system compared to calves manually fed in individual or group hutches outdoors. Seventy-six (49 Holstein-Friesian (HF) and 27 HF x Jersey) dairy heifer calves were balanced for birth weight (35.2 ± 4.95 kg), birth date (1 February ± 7.2 days) and breed. The experiment was a randomised block design with four treatments; i) indoor group housing with automated feeding (IN_AUTO; 12 calves/pen), ii) indoor group housing with manual feeding (IN_MAN; 12 calves/pen), iii) outdoor group hutch with manual feeding (OUT_G_MAN; 8 calves/pen) and iv) outdoor individual hutch with manual feeding (OUT_I_MAN; 6 calves: 1 per pen). Calves in OUT_ treatments moved outdoors at 18 days (± 5.9 days). Each treatment was replicated once. Milk allowance increased gradually from 6 L/day to 8 L/day (15% reconstitution rate) with ad-libitum fresh water, concentrates and hay offered from three days old. Gradual weaning occurred at eight weeks old. Measurements were divided into period one; before movement outdoors, and period two; after movement outdoors. Health was similar among treatments, regardless of period, with the most frequent score being zero (i.e. healthy). Summarised, standing and lying was observed 24.3% and 29.8%, respectively, in OUT_I_MAN calves, compared to 8.0% and 49.1%, for the other systems, which were similar. No difference in bodyweight existed between treatments, except at weaning where bodyweight was lower for OUT_I_MAN (67.4 ± 2.84 kg) compared to IN_MAN (74.2 ± 2.01 kg), and day 102 where OUT_I_MAN (94.1 ± 2.85 kg) were lighter than IN_AUTO (101.1 ± 2.10 kg) (P P=0.047). Total labour input was greatest for OUT_I_MAN (00:02:02 per calf/day; hh:mm:ss) and least for IN_AUTO (00:00:21 per calf/day) (P<0.001). The labour for feeding (00:00:29 per calf/day), feeding inspection (00:00:10 per calf/day) and cleaning equipment (00:00:30 per calf/day) was greatest for OUT_I_MAN. All calves showed good health and growth patterns. Differences in behaviour expressed by calves in the OUT_I_MAN, compared to other treatments may indicate compromised welfare. Thus, although outdoor group hutches do not negatively impact calves, indoor housing, particularly using automated feeders, can improve labour efficiency.