2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of driving experience on responses to a static hazard perception test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there were significantly more male experts, female expert performance was exceedingly superior. Our results are partially in accordance with previous studies conducted in other countries (e.g., Johnston & Scialfa, 2016;Scialfa et al, 2012) and suggest that our adapted version can be employed in clinical settings where time pressure is much greater than in laboratory research.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there were significantly more male experts, female expert performance was exceedingly superior. Our results are partially in accordance with previous studies conducted in other countries (e.g., Johnston & Scialfa, 2016;Scialfa et al, 2012) and suggest that our adapted version can be employed in clinical settings where time pressure is much greater than in laboratory research.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Twenty one still images, from previous work (Scialfa et al, 2012), were selected to be the stimuli in this study. From those 21 scenes, two were eliminated from the set, with the criteria that those images were not found in the Brazilian driving environment (e.g., snow on the road and a traffic sign that is not used in Brazil).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novice drivers (typically between 16 to 25 years old in most studies), compared to experienced drivers, are found to have inflexible and inefficient visual scanning strategies while driving (Crundall and Underwood, 1998;Pradhan et al, 2005;Scott et al, 2013); performed poorer in identifying latent hazards (Vlakveld, 2014); committed more driving errors with low situational awareness (Kass et al, 2007); are poorer at hazard perception (Borowsky et al, 2010;Scialfa et al, 2011Scialfa et al, , 2012; and have longer reaction times to peripheral stimuli (Patten et al, 2006). Underwood et al (2002) explained that this was due to novice drivers having inadequate mental models of the potential hazards on the roads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To address this question, the present work sought a functional measure of the value of salient information in a driving‐related decision‐making task. Stimuli were traffic scenes photographed from the driver's vantage point, and the subjects' task was to make stop‐or‐go decisions about the depicted scenes (see Scialfa et al, , for a similar task also using static images). Images were manipulated to eliminate either the salient or the non‐salient regions, as identified by Itti and Koch's (; Walther & Koch, 2006) well‐validated computational salience model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%