2010
DOI: 10.1080/03004270902760668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of conflict resolution and peer mediation training on primary school students' level of aggression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…From a gender perspective, it was concluded that the reactive and proactive aggression levels decreased for both girls and boys. From this perspective, it was determined that unlike the study (Turnuklu et al, 2010) in which only male students' aggression levels decreased, the peace education program applied in this study was effective in reducing aggression scores for both female and male students. Furthermore, the significant relationships determined between the reactive and proactive aggression in the pretests and posttests are consistent with the previous studies (see Card & Little, 2006, meta-analysis study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a gender perspective, it was concluded that the reactive and proactive aggression levels decreased for both girls and boys. From this perspective, it was determined that unlike the study (Turnuklu et al, 2010) in which only male students' aggression levels decreased, the peace education program applied in this study was effective in reducing aggression scores for both female and male students. Furthermore, the significant relationships determined between the reactive and proactive aggression in the pretests and posttests are consistent with the previous studies (see Card & Little, 2006, meta-analysis study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is observed that in studies conducted in the primary and middle school institutions toward decreasing aggression and preventing violence, the focus is rather on prevention programs, such as violence prevention (Diken, Cavkaytar, Batu, Bozkurt, & Kurtilmaz, 2011), conflict resolution (Akgun & Araz, 2014), and peer mediation (Turk & Turnuklu, 2016;Turnuklu et al, 2010;Turnuklu, Kacmaz, Sunbul, & Ergul, 2009;Yildiz et al, 2016), and that these programs are effective in preventing violence and decreasing aggression. While these programs are mainly based on peacemaking strategy, prevention programs based on positive peace and peacebuilding strategy and whose effectiveness is tested are rather limited (e.g., Damirchi & Bilge, 2014;Topcu Kabasakal, Sagkal, & Turnuklu, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Néanmoins, huit d'entre elles (Bell, Coleman, Anderson, Whelan, & Wilder, 2000;Bickmore, 2001;Cantrell, Beach, & Parks-savage, 2007;Cooke et al, 2007;Cunningham et al, 1998;Hallam, 2009;Noaks & Noaks, 2009;Stevahn, Munger, & Kealey, 2005) ont été réalisées sans groupe contrôle, condition fondamentale des critères «Evidence-Based Practice» (EPB). Dès lors, ces dernières ont été écartées et au final, 11 articles évaluant chacun un programme de médiation par les pairs différent ont été retenus (Aber, Jones, Brown, Chaudry, & Samples, 1998;Bowen, Rondeau, Rajotte, & Belanger, 2000;Flannery et al, 2003;Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group [CPPRG], 1999;Hall & Bacon, 2005;Neuenschwander, Haab Zehrê, Chiara, & Lienhard, 2013;Rondeau, Bowen, & Bélanger, 1999;Turnuklu et al, 2010). Comparer les différents résultats obtenus par ces programmes suppose tout d'abord de vérifier la qualité méthodologique des études sélectionnées.…”
Section: Critères D'inclusion Et D'exclusion Des éTudesunclassified
“…Ensuite, trois recherches (Aber et al, 1998;Bowen et al, 2000;Hall & Bacon, 2005) Leflot et al (2011), Rondeau et al (1999) et Lane-Garon (2000) répondent partiellement aux exigences «Evidence-Based», faisant preuve d'une méthodologie qualifiée ainsi de «moyenne», pour des raisons également principalement liées à la fiabilité des mesures utilisées et à la composition des groupes. Puis, deux recherches sont qualifiées de «suffisantes» Turnuklu et al, 2010) car elles manquent à de nombreux critères «Evidence-Based»: l'équivalence entre les groupes n'est pas vérifiée statistiquement, les mesures utilisées sont faiblement fiables, les conditions du groupe contrôle ne sont pas décrites. Une comparaison de l'efficacité des différents programmes de médiation par les pairs a été menée.…”
Section: Anaylse Et Interprétation Des Résultatsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation