2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(99)00121-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of beam shape on the ability to predict changes in vessel size from Doppler signal power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to distortion of the TCD's transmitting beam by the skull (Deverson, Evans, & Bouch, ) and the impact of movement of the TCD probe, great care was taken to maximize the received trueP¯ signal prior to, and during, the securing of the TCD probe to the participant's head using a snug fitting headband (Multigon Industries). Maximizing the trueP¯ signal permits the assumption that the entire cross‐sectional area of the MCA is fully captured within the sample volume of the TCD's transmitted signal and that any changes in the trueP¯ signal that ensue represent a change in MCA calibre (Deverson & Evans, ). Though no in vivo validation studies have been performed, changes in the trueP¯ signal as an index of changes in cross‐sectional area of the insonated artery has been validated using flow phantoms (Deverson & Evans, ; Hatab et al., ; Saini, Maulik, Nanda, & Rosenzweig, ), which remain the gold standard for validation of non‐invasive techniques used in humans to assess CBF such as duplex ultrasonography (Rominger et al., ) and neuroimaging (Taviani et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to distortion of the TCD's transmitting beam by the skull (Deverson, Evans, & Bouch, ) and the impact of movement of the TCD probe, great care was taken to maximize the received trueP¯ signal prior to, and during, the securing of the TCD probe to the participant's head using a snug fitting headband (Multigon Industries). Maximizing the trueP¯ signal permits the assumption that the entire cross‐sectional area of the MCA is fully captured within the sample volume of the TCD's transmitted signal and that any changes in the trueP¯ signal that ensue represent a change in MCA calibre (Deverson & Evans, ). Though no in vivo validation studies have been performed, changes in the trueP¯ signal as an index of changes in cross‐sectional area of the insonated artery has been validated using flow phantoms (Deverson & Evans, ; Hatab et al., ; Saini, Maulik, Nanda, & Rosenzweig, ), which remain the gold standard for validation of non‐invasive techniques used in humans to assess CBF such as duplex ultrasonography (Rominger et al., ) and neuroimaging (Taviani et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximizing theP signal permits the assumption that the entire crosssectional area of the MCA is fully captured within the sample volume of the TCD's transmitted signal and that any changes in theP signal that ensue represent a change in MCA calibre (Deverson & Evans, 2000a). Though no in vivo validation studies have been performed, changes in theP signal as an index of changes in cross-sectional area of the insonated artery has been validated using flow phantoms (Deverson & Evans, 2000b;Hatab et al, 1997;Saini, Maulik, Nanda, & Rosenzweig, 1983), which remain the gold standard for validation of non-invasive techniques used in humans to assess CBF such as duplex ultrasonography (Rominger et al, 2016) and neuroimaging (Taviani et al, 2010).…”
Section: Cbf and Cardiovascular Responses To Hypoxiamentioning
confidence: 99%