2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of apparatus design and test procedure on learning and memory performance of C57BL/6J mice on the Barnes maze

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The LBM was the most valid maze design for visuo-spatial learning and memory because (1) mice learned to use the spatial search strategy, (2) the size of the reversal effects was large, and (3) memory performance was good in probe trials where visuo-spatial cues were available and impaired when cues were blocked by a curtain. Together these results indicate that mice on the LBM reliably use the extra-maze visual cues to locate the escape hole using a visuo-spatial strategy, replicating our previous results (O 'Leary et al 2011;O'Leary and Brown 2012).…”
Section: Does Apparatus Design Determine the Validity Of The Barnes Msupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LBM was the most valid maze design for visuo-spatial learning and memory because (1) mice learned to use the spatial search strategy, (2) the size of the reversal effects was large, and (3) memory performance was good in probe trials where visuo-spatial cues were available and impaired when cues were blocked by a curtain. Together these results indicate that mice on the LBM reliably use the extra-maze visual cues to locate the escape hole using a visuo-spatial strategy, replicating our previous results (O 'Leary et al 2011;O'Leary and Brown 2012).…”
Section: Does Apparatus Design Determine the Validity Of The Barnes Msupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Based on our previous research (O 'Leary et al 2011;O'Leary and Brown 2012), the present experiment was conducted (1) to determine the sensitivities of three different Barnes maze designs for detecting impairments in visuo-spatial learning and memory; (2) to determine the most sensitive measures of learning and memory for each maze design; and (3) to determine the reliability of our previous results (O'Leary and Brown 2012) on the validity of each maze design as tests of visuo-spatial learning and memory. Mice completed acquisition and reversal training to assess learning, and probe trials to assess memory on three different Barnes maze designs: (1) a maze design with a small diameter, wall, and intramaze cues (SWBM); (2) a design with a small diameter and no wall (SBM); and (3) a design with a large diameter and no wall (LBM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, extrapolation of this conclusion to other cognitive tests would be premature given that sex differences are observed in other behavior tasks. For example, significant differences in performance between C57BL/6 male and female mice have been reported in the novel object recognition test 94 and passive-avoidance test 95 (but not in the Barnes maze spatial navigation test 96,97 ), and our data suggest poorer performance of female mice on the y-maze test of spontaneous alternation behavior. These tests all rely on natural exploratory activities, and activational effects of estrogen 42 may influence attention and cognitive performance in these paradigms.…”
Section: Tucker Et Alsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…To probe spatial cognition in young (3 mo) TR mice, we used two behavioral paradigms: the Barnes maze and the HPWM. The Barnes maze is a dry-land maze well suited for assessing spatial learning and memory in mice (Mayford et al 1996;O'Leary and Brown 2012). Similar to the water maze, mice are trained to use visuospatial cues in the local or extra-maze environment to orient themselves and find a specific target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we asked whether deficits in spatial learning and memory previously reported in older E4 mice could be detected in younger animals using two behavioral paradigms: the Barnes circular maze and the hidden platform water maze (HPWM) (Barnes 1979;O'Leary and Brown 2012;Washington et al 2012). In addition, we examined whether APOE alleles differentially regulate dendritic morphology of principal cells in the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC), an important source of cortical input conveying spatial information to the hippocampus, and a structure that plays a critical role in spatial representation and navigation (van Groen et al 2003;Witter and Moser 2006;van Strien et al 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%