The effects of a video vignette on increasing treatment acceptability

Abstract

The effects of a video vignette on the treatment acceptability ratings of four behavioral interventions were evaluated. Two interventions involved positive reinforcement (DRO and DRI) and two negative consequences (contingent physical restraint and contingent electric shock). Eighty‐five individuals involved in programs for individuals with developmental disabilities were randomly assigned into two groups. The experimental group (n=41) viewed a video vignette of an extremely aggressive individual whereas the control group (n=44) did not. Acceptability ratings prior to the video showed no differences between the experimental and control groups except for the physical restraint intervention. The experimental group’s post video ratings indicated significant acceptability increases for electric shock and significant decreases for DRO. There also was a significant group by testing effect with the means for the experimental group rising whereas the control group means were stable. These results showed that acceptability is alterable through video. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Training in Routine Mental Health Outcome Assessment: an evaluation of the Victorian experience

“…Video material has been used for a variety of purposes in mental health, from improving treatment acceptability for consumers (Foxx et al 1996) to improving the counselling skills of clinicians (Caris-Verhallen et al 2000). However, this is the first time to our knowledge that video vignettes have been used to support the rating of outcome measures.…”

Using Video Vignettes to Understand Perceptions of Leaders

“…The multidimensional aspect of vignettes allows for adaptability to a range of disciplines and approaches. Vignettes have been used to instruct and improve training-or program-related outcomes, such as improving educational leadership [4,5] and medical acceptability [6,7]. Vignettes are particularly effective in gauging perceptions and thoughts that are otherwise difficult to understand.…”

Systematic Review of Restraint Interventions for Challenging Behaviour Among Persons with Intellectual Disabilities: Focus on Effectiveness in Single‐Case Experiments

“…Foxx et al . ; McDonnell & Sturmey ; Sequeira & Halstead ; Cunningham et al . ; Fish & Culshaw ; Hawkins et al .…”