The effectiveness of COVID-19 testing and contact tracing in a US city

Abstract

Although testing, contact tracing, and case isolation programs can mitigate COVID-19 transmission and allow the relaxation of social distancing measures, few countries worldwide have succeeded in scaling such efforts to levels that suppress spread. The efficacy of test-trace-isolate likely depends on the speed and extent of follow-up and the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the community. Here, we use a granular model of COVID-19 transmission to estimate the public health impacts of test-trace-isolate programs across a range of programmatic and epidemiological scenarios, based on testing and contact tracing data collected on a university campus and surrounding community in Austin, TX, between October 1, 2020, and January 1, 2021. The median time between specimen collection from a symptomatic case and quarantine of a traced contact was 2 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 2 to 3) on campus and 5 days (IQR: 3 to 8) in the community. Assuming a reproduction number of 1.2, we found that detection of 40% of all symptomatic cases followed by isolation is expected to avert 39% (IQR: 30% to 45%) of COVID-19 cases. Contact tracing is expected to increase the cases averted to 53% (IQR: 42% to 58%) or 40% (32% to 47%), assuming the 2- and 5-day delays estimated on campus and in the community, respectively. In a tracing-accelerated scenario, in which 75% of contacts are notified the day after specimen collection, cases averted increase to 68% (IQR: 55% to 72%). An accelerated contact tracing program leveraging rapid testing and electronic reporting of test results can significantly curtail local COVID-19 transmission.

COVID-19 Prevention Strategies for Victoria Students within Educational Facilities: An AI-Based Modelling Study

“…The study shows that within the prevention strategies subgroup of the school-associated risk factors, contact tracing initiated by the school and testing policy contributed the most to the total impact score among both age groups. This finding is consistent with previous studies [ 12 , 13 ], which indicated that contact tracing programs and testing policies can be highly effective in swiftly preventing infections on campuses and in the community. As one of the earliest applied preventive strategies, the requirement for facial covering was another contributor to the impact score.…”

“…In addition to preventive behaviours, increased testing is essential to prevent the spread of the disease in society. This approach can improve case detection, isolation of infected individuals, and contact tracing [ 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”

Time trends and modifiable factors of contact tracing coverage in Geneva, Switzerland, June 2020 to February 2022

“…First, contacts may not follow recommendations, for instance they may evade quarantine or not use protective measures such as masks. Second, for manual contact tracing, the delay in notification and the number of contacts identified (13) may limit its effectiveness, since each new contact requires a minimum amount of time to be reached (14) and not all contacts can be reached in time to apply effective measures against the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Third, there could be intentional or un-intentional under-reporting.…”

Evaluation of mitigation policies against Omicron BA.5 in Japan: Testing, quarantine, and isolation

“…9 Contact tracing, which requires keeping track of those with whom diagnosed patients have had close contact, has been recognized as an effective mitigation policy. 10,11 However, the limitations of its contact-detecting ability and the low uptake of apps shook the reliability of the effectiveness to its foundations. .…”