2020
DOI: 10.17478/jegys.736654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of content and language integrated learning-based teaching material in the topic of the nature of matter on scientific literacy

Abstract: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of teaching materials based on Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) on scientific literacy on the topic of The Nature of Matter. Teaching material on this topic integrated the 4 pillars in CLIL, namely Content, Cognition, Communication and Culture. The Scientific Literacy Skills Scale (SLSS) measured in this study consisted of three aspects, namely explaining scientific phenomena, evaluating and designing scientific investigations, conducting data interp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As outlined in the presentation of results from this research above, these resources included an array of media that were used to incorporate environmental learning. Accordingly, these findings just like various literature reports amplify the central role played by the selection and designing of appropriate and relevant learning and teaching resources in enabling EE (Heliawati et al 2020;Kassabolat et al 2020;Kuzich et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…As outlined in the presentation of results from this research above, these resources included an array of media that were used to incorporate environmental learning. Accordingly, these findings just like various literature reports amplify the central role played by the selection and designing of appropriate and relevant learning and teaching resources in enabling EE (Heliawati et al 2020;Kassabolat et al 2020;Kuzich et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…After all, science is related to our everyday life (Parmin et al, 2016). It is no wonder Heliawati, Rubini andFirmayanto (2020, p. 1061) stated that "So, content and language are an inseparable unity." Thus, when science and literacy are integrated into science lessons, learners will be motivated to explore a scientific phenomenon (Lasagabaster, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While teaching and learning science and mathematics in a non-native language can threaten the cultural identity and undermine the local language (Ennaji, 2005;Lodge, 2016;Robertson & Graven, 2019;Sah, 2020;Sah & Li, 2018), it can, on the other hand, contribute to the advancement of an individual's socioeconomic mobility domestically and internationally (Albury, 2019;Piller & Cho, 2013;De Swaan, 2001) without having a negative impact on the cultural identity and the value of the native language in the society (Cummins, 2000;Navés, 2009;Ngugi, 1994;Sumaryono & Ortiz, 2004). Furthermore, while some researchers perceive teaching and learning science and mathematics in a non-native language as an opportunity for students to achieve the aspects of science and mathematics literacy (Kuteeva & Airey, 2013;Sandström et al, 2013), other researchers argue that the lack of proficiency in the non-native language, as the language of science and mathematics instruction, can hamper the learning of these subjects (Heliawati et al, 2020;Hu & Gao, 2020;Kibirige & Mogofe, 2021).…”
Section: Review Of Theoretical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while some researchers perceive teaching and learning science and mathematics in a non-native language as an opportunity for students to achieve the aspects of science and mathematics literacy (Kuteeva & Airey, 2013;Sandström et al, 2013), other researchers argue that the lack of proficiency in the non-native language, as the language of science and mathematics instruction, can hamper the learning of these subjects (Heliawati et al, 2020;Hu & Gao, 2020;Kibirige & Mogofe, 2021).…”
Section: Language In the Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation