2014
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.114.089573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of breakfast recommendations on weight loss: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: A recommendation to eat or skip breakfast for weight loss was effective at changing self-reported breakfast eating habits, but contrary to widely espoused views this had no discernable effect on weight loss in free-living adults who were attempting to lose weight.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
88
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, our examination of body mass changes as an indication 152 of net energy (im)balance better reflects an efficacy trial and nicely complements the results of a 153 concurrent effectiveness trial which reported no significant difference in weight-loss over weeks with a recommendation to eat or skip breakfast (i.e. an intention-to-treat analysis) (13) . Our 155 data are consistent with this conclusion in that there was no significant difference in total body 156 mass change between breakfast versus fasting amongst individuals who were either lean (14) or obese (15) , although it is interesting to contrast the pattern of changes in DEXA-derived body 158 composition between groups across both levels of adiposity ( Figure 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this sense, our examination of body mass changes as an indication 152 of net energy (im)balance better reflects an efficacy trial and nicely complements the results of a 153 concurrent effectiveness trial which reported no significant difference in weight-loss over weeks with a recommendation to eat or skip breakfast (i.e. an intention-to-treat analysis) (13) . Our 155 data are consistent with this conclusion in that there was no significant difference in total body 156 mass change between breakfast versus fasting amongst individuals who were either lean (14) or obese (15) , although it is interesting to contrast the pattern of changes in DEXA-derived body 158 composition between groups across both levels of adiposity ( Figure 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Casazza et al (16) conducted a systematic review of obesity-related beliefs about weight loss, therein stating that evidence was lacking to support the notion that skipping breakfast independently affected obesity. Several of these authors conducted a randomized controlled weight-loss trial comparing breakfast-skipping, breakfast-eating, and control groups, finding that weight loss was not different among the groups (25). However, the influence of fasting in this study is unclear because the length of fasting across the night and into the morning was not recorded; the minimum difference in the length of morning fasting permissible in the intervention groups was only 1 hour; and the cessation of eating at night was not controlled.…”
Section: Energy Intakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study involved a degree of dietary restriction beyond the consumption or omission of breakfast in the morning, and as such may not reflect true alterations in eating behaviour. Dhurandhar et al (46) investigated the effect of recommendations to consume or omit breakfast, in freeliving adults attempting to lose weight. Subjects (n 283) were randomly assigned to either consume or omit breakfast for 16 weeks, and results were compared with a control group.…”
Section: Multiple Exposure Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%