2017
DOI: 10.4274/jpr.97658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Vitamin D Deficiency on the Severity of Bronchiolitis in Infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Current study revealed no significant difference in respiratory rate at discharge between children with vitamin D and those with no vitamin D. This finding is similar to Rajshekhar et al (20) study in India which found that supplementation of vitamin D to less than 5 years age children with pneumonia would not improve the primary outcomes. This finding regarding respiratory rate is inconsistent with results of Erol et al (21) study in Turkey which found that vitamin D deficiency was associated with severity of bronchiolitis in children. Many authors proved that vitamin D deficiency in both mothers and children was associated with high risk of acute lower respiratory tract infections (22) , while others reported no significant association between vitamin D deficiency and acute lower respiratory tract infections (23) .…”
Section: Discussion:-contrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Current study revealed no significant difference in respiratory rate at discharge between children with vitamin D and those with no vitamin D. This finding is similar to Rajshekhar et al (20) study in India which found that supplementation of vitamin D to less than 5 years age children with pneumonia would not improve the primary outcomes. This finding regarding respiratory rate is inconsistent with results of Erol et al (21) study in Turkey which found that vitamin D deficiency was associated with severity of bronchiolitis in children. Many authors proved that vitamin D deficiency in both mothers and children was associated with high risk of acute lower respiratory tract infections (22) , while others reported no significant association between vitamin D deficiency and acute lower respiratory tract infections (23) .…”
Section: Discussion:-contrasting
confidence: 95%
“…So far, conflicting results have been reported about this association. Our finding is in line with a study on 102 children aged 1–24 months with bronchiolitis, in which vitamin D concentration was significantly lower in the hospitalized group than in the non-hospitalized group [ 19 ]. Moreover, a deficit of vitamin D serum levels has been described in children aged <2 years hospitalized for bronchiolitis in the previous study by Halasa et al [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Since 1997, it has been shown in developing countries, where malnutrition and micronutrient deficiency were more common, that the incidence of pneumonia was higher in children with rickets [ 124 , 126 , 131 ], and treatment failure was seen more frequently in rachitic children [ 132 ]. Similar studies were conducted worldwide, evaluating the circulating levels of vitamin D in children with LRTI and in controls: several studies found that lower vitamin D levels were associated with higher risk of developing an acute respiratory tract infection [ 125 , 130 , 132 , 133 , 135 , 139 , 144 ], or were linked to a more severe course of illness [ 136 , 142 ], with more frequent need for oxygen supplementation, ventilation support [ 134 ], or increased risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and longer hospital stay [ 143 ].…”
Section: Vitamin Dmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We searched PubMed using keywords such as “vitamin D” and “lower respiratory tract infections” or “viral infections,” focusing on studies on pediatric populations, including both observational studies and clinical trials. Numerous studies investigated the association between low levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and increased susceptibility to LRTI in childhood, as listed in Table 4 [ 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 ].…”
Section: Vitamin Dmentioning
confidence: 99%