2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of vein repair on the risk of venous thromboembolic events: A review of more than 100 traumatic military venous injuries

Abstract: In the largest review of military venous trauma in more than three decades, we found no difference in the incidence of venous thromboembolic complications between venous injuries managed by open repair vs ligation. Blast injuries of the extremities have caused most of the venous injuries. Ligation is the most common modality of treatment in combat zones. Long-term morbidity associated with venous injuries and their management will be assessed in future follow-up studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5][6]16 Moreover, there is no appreciable increased risk of thromboembolism with venous repair, providing further evidence supporting this strategy. 15 In our cohort, several individuals had vein disruption shunted early in the course of injury. This may have affected even- tual outcome, but it is difficult to discern and not a focus of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[5][6]16 Moreover, there is no appreciable increased risk of thromboembolism with venous repair, providing further evidence supporting this strategy. 15 In our cohort, several individuals had vein disruption shunted early in the course of injury. This may have affected even- tual outcome, but it is difficult to discern and not a focus of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Individual registries in OIF have reported early amputation rates of 5% to 10% [5][6][7][8] as opposed to 50% in World War II 9 and 10% to 20% for Korea and Vietnam. [10][11][12][13][14] Yet, current in-theater descriptions of TVS, 2-4 venous injury repair, 5,15,16 and other employed treatment maneuvers allude only to technical considerations and immediate, or early limb salvage and fail to include long term outcomes or risk analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In modern combat theatres (Iraq and Afghanistan data) high venous repair rates were maintained (82% and 61%),7 8 but was 36% in Sri Lankan war theatres. The low rate of venous repair in this current analysis was due to the number of cases that had to be managed by the surgeons at a particular given time in this resource poor setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, that experienced showed no increased incidence of venous thrombosis or pulmonary thrombembolism in the cohort of patients undergoing extremity vein repair. 33 Extremity vein injury in the multiply injured patient who is in poor physiologic condition should be ligated. Similarly, complex extremity vein injuries that require long segment interposition grafting or use of synthetic conduits should be managed with ligation in most instances.…”
Section: Junctional Distal Iliac and Proximal Femoral Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%