1995
DOI: 10.1016/0278-4254(94)00021-r
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The effect of using diagnostic decision aids for analytical procedures on judges' liability judgments

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
36
3
2
0

Citation Types

1
23
0
0

Year Published

Range
1993
1993
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
34
2
2
1

Relationship

0
39

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 39 publications

(24 citation statements)
references

References 27 publications

1
23
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Consistent with the need to trim the list to a manageable size, literature is cited regarding the expectations of U.S. judges that auditors will exhaustively search whatever explanations are finally included in a decision aid (Anderson et al, 1995). This study validates the results of Anderson et al (1997), to provide evidence on the utility of a decision aid to assist auditors with audit effectiveness in the application of analytical procedures.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Decision aids may be lengthy, such as the list of 15 explanations used in the analytical procedures decision aid in Anderson et al (1995Anderson et al ( , 1997. Circumstances of budgetary constraints and limited cognitive load may inhibit an auditor from fully using a lengthy list of explanations in a subsequent search of information during the audit.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation