B15. Copd Pharmacotherapy 2009
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2009.179.1_meetingabstracts.a2466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Tiotropium on COPD GOLD Stage II during the Four-Year UPLIFT Trial.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, in a subgroup of COPD patients of the UPLIFT study, which were not on other controller medication, a reduction in the accelerated FEV 1 decline was observed in the tiotropium bromide arm (post-hoc analysis of the UPLIFT study [44]). This was also observed in the subgroup of stage II COPD patients [45]. Collectively, besides the well described bronchodilatory effects, these findings suggest additional, non-bronchodilator properties for tiotropium bromide [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Nonetheless, in a subgroup of COPD patients of the UPLIFT study, which were not on other controller medication, a reduction in the accelerated FEV 1 decline was observed in the tiotropium bromide arm (post-hoc analysis of the UPLIFT study [44]). This was also observed in the subgroup of stage II COPD patients [45]. Collectively, besides the well described bronchodilatory effects, these findings suggest additional, non-bronchodilator properties for tiotropium bromide [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Indeed guidelines require this type of post-hoc analysis since they encourage more targeted therapy to specific patient groups. Based on the size of studies like TORCH and UPLIFT [ 10 ], there is reasonable power to conduct exploratory post-hoc analysis of secondary outcomes. In the case of TORCH, where approximately one-third of the TORCH study population fell into the GOLD stage II category, the present post-hoc analysis demonstrates that SFC improved SGRQ, reduced exacerbations and improved lung function when compared with placebo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distribution appears to be similar to the FEV 1 % predicted distribution of stage II COPD patients from a 2005–2007 UK General Practice Research Database population-based cohort study [GSK Worldwide Epidemiology (WEUSKOP2207) Final study report, May 2009. Data on file] and the demographics of the TORCH GOLD stage II population is also similar to that of the UPLIFT clinical trial [ 10 ]. The majority of patients were also sufficiently symptomatic, as indicated by high baseline SGRQ total score, to have presented and been diagnosed with COPD, most likely as a result of exacerbations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 40 excluded publications, seven did not cite an eligible smoking history, 10-16 five reported duplicate data published elsewhere, [17][18][19][20][21] 11 reported no relevant data, 22-32 and 17 were not double-blind RCTs. [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] Of the 24 publications that met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review (see Table 1), 16 compared tiotropium with placebo, [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65] seven compared tiotropium with an active comparator, [66][67][68][69][70][71][72] and one compared tiotropium with both placebo and an active comparator.…”
Section: Summary Of Search Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%