Symposium on Spatial User Interaction 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3385959.3418449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Spatial Reference on Visual Attention and Workload during Viewpoint Guidance in Augmented Reality

Abstract: Figure 1: User study to compare egocentric and exocentric target cueing during the localization of nearby off-screen targets. (left) Test subject wearing a video see-through HMD and pointing toward a cued target. (middle) Exocentric map guidance, interfered with a target oddball stimulus. (right) Egocentric arrow guidance, interfered with a standard oddball stimulus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Markov‐Vetter et al took the RR interval—the time between two successive R‐wave peaks of the QRS signal as well as pNN50 and RMSSD derived from it, which are said to be reliable indicators of parasympathetic activity. For both, the smaller the value, the higher the level of excitation and stress (Markov‐Vetter et al, 2020). While mean RR times showed a significant effect of the system, pNN50 and RMSSD did not.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Markov‐Vetter et al took the RR interval—the time between two successive R‐wave peaks of the QRS signal as well as pNN50 and RMSSD derived from it, which are said to be reliable indicators of parasympathetic activity. For both, the smaller the value, the higher the level of excitation and stress (Markov‐Vetter et al, 2020). While mean RR times showed a significant effect of the system, pNN50 and RMSSD did not.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desde la revisión, se identificaron cuatro atributos de configuración del entorno virtual: el sistema de referencia, la cobertura angular, la proximidad al usuario y el campo visual. De estos atributos, según la literatura encontrada, se consideran mayores los efectos del sistema de referencia y del FOV, especialmente porque, en el caso de sistema de referencia, crea una base de ubicación y orientación de los usuarios, fomentando o degradando la adecuada relación de estos con su entorno virtual, como lo menciona Müller [79] y Markov-Vetter [80]. De igual forma, el campo visual tiene un efecto que vincula especialmente los dispositivos de visualización (head-sets) y el efecto de la carga mental, como lo menciona Czerwinski [81].…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusiónunclassified