2004
DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.01.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of seat position on wheelchair propulsion biomechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
72
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
72
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…15 (e) Wheelchair can be modified by changing the position of axle as more forward axle position has been correlated with improvement in wheelchair biomechanics. 16 (f) Propulsion technique with least energy expenditure can be taught to the individual with paraplegia such as semicircular propulsion technique. Semicircular propulsion technique displays characteristics consistent with reduced repetitions and more efficient propulsion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 (e) Wheelchair can be modified by changing the position of axle as more forward axle position has been correlated with improvement in wheelchair biomechanics. 16 (f) Propulsion technique with least energy expenditure can be taught to the individual with paraplegia such as semicircular propulsion technique. Semicircular propulsion technique displays characteristics consistent with reduced repetitions and more efficient propulsion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many experimental studies have shown low ratios of tangential force to total pushrim force, the so-called Fraction Effective Force (FEF), during wheelchair propulsion even for experienced users [6,7]. This indicates large FEF with a more tangential pushrim force direction is not necessarily associated with higher efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seat position is an easily adjustable parameter that directly influences propulsion biomechanics (e.g., Boninger et al, 2000;Richter, 2001;Kotajarvi et al, 2004;Gorce and Louis, 2012) and upper extremity demand (e.g., Boninger et al, 2005;Mulroy et al, 2005;Requejo et al, 2008a). Thus, identifying the optimal seat position that minimizes upper extremity demand holds great promise for reducing the risk of pain and injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, identifying the optimal seat position that minimizes upper extremity demand holds great promise for reducing the risk of pain and injury. A number of studies have examined the influence of seat position on propulsion mechanics and found relationships with specific biomechanical measures such as cadence (e.g., Masse et al, 1992;Boninger et al, 2000;Richter, 2001;Kotajarvi et al, 2004;Gorce and Louis, 2012), handrim forces (e.g., Boninger et al, 2000;van der Woude et al, 2009), joint ranges of motion (e.g., Hughes et al, 1992;Wei et al, 2003;Gorce and Louis, 2012) and electromyography (EMG) activity (e.g., Masse et al, 1992;Gutierrez et al, 2005;Louis and Gorce, 2010). High levels of these measures have been identified as risk factors for upper extremity pain and injury (e.g., Boninger et al, 2005;Gutierrez et al, 2005;Gorce and Louis, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%