1995
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.131.4.415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of regular sunscreen use on vitamin D levels in an Australian population. Results of a randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
69
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
69
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-report of sunlight exposure using questionnaires has been shown to poorly correlate with more objective measures, such as dosimetry (31). While the application of sunscreen with a sun protection factor of 8 was shown in a controlled experiment to interfere with the cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D (32), 'real-life' trials have failed to document any correlation between sunscreen use and serum 25OHD levels, perhaps due to the inappropriate application of sunscreen (33,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-report of sunlight exposure using questionnaires has been shown to poorly correlate with more objective measures, such as dosimetry (31). While the application of sunscreen with a sun protection factor of 8 was shown in a controlled experiment to interfere with the cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D (32), 'real-life' trials have failed to document any correlation between sunscreen use and serum 25OHD levels, perhaps due to the inappropriate application of sunscreen (33,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 A possible explanation for this conclusion is the well-documented fact that in actual use most individuals apply sunscreens at much lower concentrations than the concentration mandated for sunscreen SPF testing (0.5-0.8 mg/cm 2 in actual use vs 2 mg/cm 2 required for SPF determination), hence resulting in a significantly lower in-use SPF compared with the labeled SPF. [46][47][48] It has been shown that full body exposure of fair-skinned individuals to 10 to 15 minutes of midday summer sun is equivalent to one MED and resulted in the synthesis of approximately 15,000 IU/d of vitamin D 3 . 48 By this reasoning, exposure of 15% of the body surface area (eg, face, hands, and arms) to a level of one-third MED should result in cutaneous biosynthesis of 1000 IU/d of vitamin D 3 .…”
Section: What Should We Advise Patients On Photoprotection Practices mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we did account for reported sunscreen use in our estimates of oral vitamin D equivalent (Tables 3 and 4). Whether or not the adjustment for sunscreen use is valid is unknown as some evidence from the literature indicates sunscreen use does not reduce UVB exposures when self-applied (52)(53)(54)(55)(56) , although sunscreen applied under controlled research conditions at a sufficient thickness and sun protection factor can prevent significant increases in serum 25(OH)D from occurring (57) . Nevertheless, our estimates do support the idea that a substantial proportion of vitamin D comes from sun exposure in the warmer months relative to that from diet and supplements, even with adjustment for sunscreen use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%