2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of primary thermo-mechanical treatment on TRIP steel microstructure and mechanical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure also shows the microstructures of hot rolled and furnace cooled specimens. Figure d shows a severe ferritic–pearlitic banded structure, which is a result of the chemical segregation of some alloying elements (e.g., Mn) during solidification and subsequent pancaking of the inhomogeneous austenitic during hot rolling . The presence of ill‐defined banded structure in Figure e reveals that 12 h annealing at 1150 °C is not enough to remove chemical homogeneity; whereas by nearly full homogenization as shown in Figure f, the banded structure vanishes completely and the resultant morphology is very similar with the one presented in Figure c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Figure also shows the microstructures of hot rolled and furnace cooled specimens. Figure d shows a severe ferritic–pearlitic banded structure, which is a result of the chemical segregation of some alloying elements (e.g., Mn) during solidification and subsequent pancaking of the inhomogeneous austenitic during hot rolling . The presence of ill‐defined banded structure in Figure e reveals that 12 h annealing at 1150 °C is not enough to remove chemical homogeneity; whereas by nearly full homogenization as shown in Figure f, the banded structure vanishes completely and the resultant morphology is very similar with the one presented in Figure c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The M s temperature of completely austenitic microstructure can be calculated as 430°C by equation of the form M s = 539-423C -30.4Mn -7.5Si ? 30Al [5]. Based on the lever rule, by intercritical annealing at 790°C, a microstructure consisting of 35% austenite and 65% ferrite is expected to be achieved and the level of carbon in the austenite phase becomes as high as 0.5 wt%.…”
Section: Chemically Inhomogeneous But Microstructurally Homogeneous Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the high yield strength for the BIT temperature of 400°C can be ascribed to the formation of some martensite during BIT due to the presence of some prior unstable austenite areas with higher M s temperature. The latter is a result of rapid cooling, which disturbs the distribution of carbon during preprocessing and subsequent formation of austenite during intercritical annealing in both lean and rich regions from alloying elements [5].…”
Section: Chemically Inhomogeneous But Microstructurally Homogeneous Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their good mechanical properties result from a complex microstructure containing ferritic matrix, carbide-free bainite and retained austenite [1,2]. Suitable microstructures with proper volume fractions, distributions and morphologies of individual phases and structural components are produced usually by thermo-mechanical treatment [1,3]. Ideal processing parameters vary according to the particular chemical composition of steel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%