2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of pair-instability mass loss on black-hole mergers

Abstract: Context. Mergers of two stellar origin black holes are a prime source of gravitational waves and are under intensive investigation. One crucial ingredient in their modeling has been neglected: pair-instability pulsation supernovae with associated severe mass loss may suppress the formation of massive black holes, decreasing black hole merger rates for the highest black hole masses. Aims. We demonstrate the effects of pair-instability pulsation supernovae on merger rate and mass using populations of double blac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
426
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 429 publications
(459 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
28
426
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This mass gap covers the range of ∼60-130 M e over which it is thought that stellar black holes do not form due to disruption by pair instability supernovae (Marchant et al 2016). Furthermore, black holes below the mass gap may be limited to <50 M e by severe mass loss in pulsation pair instability supernovae (Belczynski et al 2016). Also, the collapse of massive stars is only thought to produce black hole spins of -< a 0.75 0.9 (Gammie et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mass gap covers the range of ∼60-130 M e over which it is thought that stellar black holes do not form due to disruption by pair instability supernovae (Marchant et al 2016). Furthermore, black holes below the mass gap may be limited to <50 M e by severe mass loss in pulsation pair instability supernovae (Belczynski et al 2016). Also, the collapse of massive stars is only thought to produce black hole spins of -< a 0.75 0.9 (Gammie et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in Spera et al (2019), massive stellar mergers occurring through binary evolution may have important consequences for the formation of massive BHs, specifically BHs lying within the so-called upper mass-gap expected from (pulsational) pair instability SNe (e.g., Belczynski et al 2016b;Woosley 2016;Spera & Mapelli 2017). In principle, dynamically-mediated stellar collisions of massive stars in GCs may have similar implications for BH formation.…”
Section: White Dwarfs Collisions -Connecting To High-energy Transientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Black hole formation: we assume BHs are formed with mass fallback and calculate BH natal kicks by sampling from the same distribution as CCSN NSs but with BH kicks reduced in magnitude according to the fractional mass of fallback material (see Fryer et al 2012;Morscher et al 2015, for further details). We also implement prescriptions to treat pulsational-pair instabilities and pair-instability supernovae as described in Belczynski et al (2016b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2N masses of the binary components are drawn from a log-flat distribution between [5,95]M for stellar-origin BHs, and from a uniform distribution within [10 6 , 10 7 ]M for massive BHs. For stellar-origin BHs we also require that m 1 + m 2 < 100M [93,94]. In both mass ranges the spins are sampled from a uniform distribution ∈ [−1, 1].…”
Section: Statistical Analysis: Constraining the Beyond-kerr Ringmentioning
confidence: 99%