1980
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(80)90079-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Nonzero ∇ · B on the numerical solution of the magnetohydrodynamic equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
584
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 667 publications
(608 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
5
584
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(6) which is obtained numerically, so that any error in matching these values by ψ(x, y, z) reduces to a finite jump close to the boundaries. Finally, we notice that this method is often used to remove the divergence of a vector field (Brackbill & Barnes 1980, sometimes referred to as "projection method"), and it has the property of conserving the current, i.e., ∇ × B J = ∇ × B J,s .…”
Section: Helmholtz Decomposition Of the Potential Part Of The Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) which is obtained numerically, so that any error in matching these values by ψ(x, y, z) reduces to a finite jump close to the boundaries. Finally, we notice that this method is often used to remove the divergence of a vector field (Brackbill & Barnes 1980, sometimes referred to as "projection method"), and it has the property of conserving the current, i.e., ∇ × B J = ∇ × B J,s .…”
Section: Helmholtz Decomposition Of the Potential Part Of The Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this system may generate some uncertainty [42]. The projection method proposed in [43] has been widely used. The projection involves the solution of a Poisson equation and also restricts the choice of boundary conditions.…”
Section: E-cusp Scheme For Mhd Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-order numerical discretizations for MHD space-physics flows must properly handle the solenoidal constraint for the magnetic field (i.e., ∇ · B = 0) [16] so as to provide stability to the discrete system of differential equations and to avoid unphysical plasma transport effects [17]. They must efficiently provide both solution accuracy and monotonicity even in the presence of large solution gradients and/or discontinuous solutions (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of approaches have been proposed to handle the ∇ · B constraint. One option is to employ an elliptic correction scheme, called the "Hodge Projection", which essentially projects a vector field onto its solenoidal part [17,32]. While the elliptic correction scheme maintains solenoidality up to machine accuracy (in the chosen discretization), it requires a Poisson equation to be solved at each hyperbolic step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%