The Sustainable Global Marketplace 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10873-5_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Interpersonal Counterproductive Behavior on the Performance of New Product Development Teams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with the view of Matanmi ( 2007) that the concept of efficiency as applicable to the context of the employment relationship is a function of proper management of employees at work, including the adherence to workplace ethical standards. This is also in agreement with Qiu (2013) who posited that absenteeism, unwarranted breaks, stealing of organization property, converting office equipment for personal use, gossiping are characteristic of unethical conducts and are liable to affect public and private enterprises. Hence, the commitment and satisfaction become immaterial if it does not infuse with integrity Arnold (2009).…”
Section: Social Values On Ethical Leadership and Employee Performance On Public And Private Enterprisesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These findings are consistent with the view of Matanmi ( 2007) that the concept of efficiency as applicable to the context of the employment relationship is a function of proper management of employees at work, including the adherence to workplace ethical standards. This is also in agreement with Qiu (2013) who posited that absenteeism, unwarranted breaks, stealing of organization property, converting office equipment for personal use, gossiping are characteristic of unethical conducts and are liable to affect public and private enterprises. Hence, the commitment and satisfaction become immaterial if it does not infuse with integrity Arnold (2009).…”
Section: Social Values On Ethical Leadership and Employee Performance On Public And Private Enterprisesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…If there is a huge gap between the emotions felt and display rules; employees are more likely only to engage in surface acting (Scott, Barnes and Wagner, 2012: 905). They may need to suppress the display of anger or irritation due to the professional requirements; they may feel lonely and marginalized from the organization and the duty (Qiu and Peschek, 2012). Thus, emotional dissonance, which refers to a the conflict between norms of emotional display and an employee's felt emotion is considered to have negative outcomes such as job dissatisfaction and emotional exhaustion (Günsel, 2014).…”
Section: Situational Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human aspectsindividual team members and their interactions over processes and tools-play an important role in the execution of software development process and the quality of resulting products (Colomo-Palacios et al, 2010;Graziotin et al, 2014). Software development as a knowledge intensive work group activity is closely dependent upon how team members work together toward a common goal (Qiu and Peschek, 2012). Thus, the quality of the new software product cannot be viewed as the outcome of mere individual attempts; it requires collective actio ns and intensive teamwork to be successfully completed (Lin et al, 2011).…”
Section: Software Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the quality of the new software product cannot be viewed as the outcome of mere individual attempts; it requires collective actio ns and intensive teamwork to be successfully completed (Lin et al, 2011). Any single team member who works in isolation will be at a disadvantage compared to a team of individuals who can utilize the entirety of the team members" contributions (Qiu and Peschek, 2012). Especially, the literature indicates that the success of software projects depends on the interaction of knowledge and skills, which essentially a process that requires cross functional integration and intense social interactions among team members (Nicholson and Sahay, 2004;Hoegl and Parboteeah, 2007).…”
Section: Software Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation