2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00541-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of inoculum size on the lag phase of Listeria monocytogenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
89
1
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
10
89
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A challenge test in which the inoculum contains too many organisms may overstress the preservative system of a product which would not normally be at risk and lead to an overestimation of the risk, whereas too few organisms may give false negative results (Rose and Stringer, 1987). Studies have shown that beneath the common inoculation level of 1000 cfu/ml, the lag phase becomes longer and the probability of growth is less (Gay et al, 1996;Robinson et al, 2001;Pascual et al, 2001). Farber and Daley (1994) found that when L. monocytogenes was present in very low numbers on meats such as sliced ham, turkey breasts, wieners, and pâté stored at 4 jC, its numbers did not increase.…”
Section: Choice Of Inoculum Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A challenge test in which the inoculum contains too many organisms may overstress the preservative system of a product which would not normally be at risk and lead to an overestimation of the risk, whereas too few organisms may give false negative results (Rose and Stringer, 1987). Studies have shown that beneath the common inoculation level of 1000 cfu/ml, the lag phase becomes longer and the probability of growth is less (Gay et al, 1996;Robinson et al, 2001;Pascual et al, 2001). Farber and Daley (1994) found that when L. monocytogenes was present in very low numbers on meats such as sliced ham, turkey breasts, wieners, and pâté stored at 4 jC, its numbers did not increase.…”
Section: Choice Of Inoculum Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some individual lag time distributions have been characterized (23,33). The variability of individual lag times seems to be wider as microorganisms are injured (4,33,34,39) or as growth conditions are unfavorable (23,24,27).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most models for bacterial growth in food, as well as most experimental work in this area, are based on the use of relatively high inocula grown under homogeneous conditions (80). A more realistic scenario probably involves small numbers of contaminating bacteria that have been subjected to various physiological stresses such as starvation, heat injury, or osmotic shock (80,160,193,225). At these low levels of contamination, a single cell could give rise to a population that could ultimately cause spoilage or disease.…”
Section: Afterwordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individually based modeling approaches, in conjunction with experimental evidence, can be useful in assessing these risks (130,157). Although this review has focused primarily on "high-tech" methods of single-cell analysis, much of the work done in bridging predictive modeling in food with experimental observation has been carried out using relatively "low-tech" tools such as turbidometry (80,160,193,225,255). In this approach, bacterial cultures are serially diluted to near extinction, yielding a high probability that individual wells of a microtiter plate will contain a single cell (80,225).…”
Section: Afterwordmentioning
confidence: 99%