2010
DOI: 10.3386/w15998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Housing on Portfolio Choice

Abstract: provided outstanding research assistance. We are grateful for funding from National Science Foundation Grants SES 0522073 and 0752835. Szeidl thanks the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation for support. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

14
126
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
14
126
9
Order By: Relevance
“…As the classification of activity refers to the 2000 to 2007 period, we restrict attention to activity and participation at the end of 2007. We let the individual continuous characteristics enter linearly, and as an alternative we consider piecewise linear splines for them, as in, for example, Chetty, Sándor, and Szeidl (). The characteristics are chosen to be largely consistent with a structural life‐cycle model of portfolio choice, similar to the model that we develop in the next section.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the classification of activity refers to the 2000 to 2007 period, we restrict attention to activity and participation at the end of 2007. We let the individual continuous characteristics enter linearly, and as an alternative we consider piecewise linear splines for them, as in, for example, Chetty, Sándor, and Szeidl (). The characteristics are chosen to be largely consistent with a structural life‐cycle model of portfolio choice, similar to the model that we develop in the next section.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Some examples include Cocco (2005) and Chetty, Laszlo, and Szeidl (2017), who studied the effects on portfolio choice; Ortalo-Magne and Rady (2006) and Favilukis, Ludvigson, and Van Nieuwerburgh (2017), who studied the effects on equilibrium prices and transactions; Corbae and Quintin (2015), who focused on foreclosures in the housing bust; Gete and Reher (2016), who studied the effects on homeownership; and Keys, Piskorski, Seru, and Yao (2014), who explored the role of housing in transmitting monetary policy. Under certain conditions, we can think of the possibility set of mortgage originations as analogous to a production possibility frontier, with borrower characteristics as inputs and contract terms as outputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brueckner () offers a formal model to study a household's mortgage‐size decision and shows that the size of mortgage depends on the rate of return on investment and the tax savings from the deductibility mortgage interest. A recent paper by Chetty, Sandor and Szeidl () examines the effects of housing on household portfolio choices and show that while an exogenous increase in mortgage debt leads to a decrease in the share of liquid wealth held in stocks, an exogenous increase in home equity raises stock ownership.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%