2017
DOI: 10.7196/samj.2017.v107i8.12045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of HIV status on clinical outcomes of surgical sepsis in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is despite the large proportion of HIV‐positive patients (82%) in this study with a detectable viral load. Similar to our findings, a study that compared the effects of HIV status on clinical outcomes of surgical sepsis in the KwaZulu‐Natal Province of South Africa did not report significant differences in clinical presentation, spectrum of surgical disease or morbidity/mortality . Weledji et al concluded that patients with HIV/AIDS should not be regarded as a homogenous group and that the best predictors of peri‐operative morbidity and mortality are scores that measure general health, such as the American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) risk score .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is despite the large proportion of HIV‐positive patients (82%) in this study with a detectable viral load. Similar to our findings, a study that compared the effects of HIV status on clinical outcomes of surgical sepsis in the KwaZulu‐Natal Province of South Africa did not report significant differences in clinical presentation, spectrum of surgical disease or morbidity/mortality . Weledji et al concluded that patients with HIV/AIDS should not be regarded as a homogenous group and that the best predictors of peri‐operative morbidity and mortality are scores that measure general health, such as the American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) risk score .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[8][9][10] Studies from Africa have also showed similar conflicting results. [11][12][13] A recent large multinational prospective cohort study also did not show poor outcomes among HIV-infected patients. 14 Studies have also differed in the patient populations, with some studies focussing solely on cardiac surgery, 11 anorectal surgeries, 12 orthopaedic surgeries, 13 etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In overall hospital mortality models, further adjustment for duration of care was performed to control for temporal trends in sepsis outcomes [15,42]. Analyses were performed for the overall study population and, as HIV impacts mortality outcomes in LMICs, analyses were performed separately for HIV uninfected and HIV infected cases as pre-planned subgroups [23,24,43]. Due to the multiple models developed, a pre-defined significance level of p b 0.005 was used [34].…”
Section: Materials and Thethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the clinical utility of the qSOFA score in HIV-infected patients, which are more prevalent in LMICs [21], commonly suffer from distinct infectious etiologies (i.e. fungal and mycobacteria), have altered and impaired immune response mechanisms [22] and have higher mortality from sepsis [2326], has been minimally studied [19]. Compounding these gaps in the evidence, there is no research evaluating ED-specific outcomes from sepsis in LMICs from sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where mortality risks are up to 100 fold greater than in HIC EDs [8,27], and as such representing a population with a great margin for benefit from rapid and appropriate identification of the highest risk sepsis patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%