2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Formant Biofeedback on the Feminization of Voice in Transgender Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Other authors and clinicians continue to use oral resonance therapy and formant biofeedback therapy in behavioral modification sessions. 11,12,13 Hancock et al, understanding the limitations of fundamental frequency as a sole factor for voice gender recognition, studied intonation as a function of voice-gender recognition in a cohort is cis-male, cis-female, trans-male, and trans-female speakers. The results showed that speakers perceived as females by listeners had more "upward intonation" and a larger utterance semitone range in all groups of speakers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Other authors and clinicians continue to use oral resonance therapy and formant biofeedback therapy in behavioral modification sessions. 11,12,13 Hancock et al, understanding the limitations of fundamental frequency as a sole factor for voice gender recognition, studied intonation as a function of voice-gender recognition in a cohort is cis-male, cis-female, trans-male, and trans-female speakers. The results showed that speakers perceived as females by listeners had more "upward intonation" and a larger utterance semitone range in all groups of speakers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,26,27 However, these outcomes may not accurately reflect client satisfaction or voice-related quality of life. Listeners' perceptions of gender do correlate with F 0 , formant frequency, and intonation patterns 7,8,[28][29][30][31][32][33] (with F 0 the strongest predictor of gender perception 34 ), but F 0 does not necessarily correlate with voice satisfaction 35 or voice-related quality of life. 36,37 Furthermore, correct gendering does not always translate to higher voice satisfaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…공명 음성(resonant voice)은 잘 뻗어 나가고 산출하기 편하며, 마 스크라 불리는 코와 입 주변 부위가 진동하는 감각을 동반하는 음 성을 말한다 (Smith, Finnegan, & Karnell, 2005;Titze, 2001) (Song, Sim, & Choi, 2000). (Kawitzky & McAllister, 2020;Ribeiro et al, 2019;Schalling, Gustafsson, Ternström, Wilén, & Södersten, 2013) (Allen, 2007;Yorkston, Spencer, & Duffy, 2003). 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다(p =.002) (Figure 4).…”
unclassified