2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-019-04056-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of filum terminale sectioning for Chiari 1 malformation treatment: systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found strong consensus on this topic: (1) the association between CM1 and the “true” or “manifest” tethered cord is universally found to be very rare and occasional [ 53 ]; (2) in those rare instances where a tethered cord syndrome is present in CM1 subjects, a de-tethering procedure is successfully performed to cure the syndrome but does not produce effects on the CM1 [ 54 ]; (3) the occult tethered cord syndrome remains a controversial and questionable entity [ 55 ] and more than 80% of panelists questioned its existence; (4) in case of symptomatic tethered cord, an intradural section of the filum terminale is recommended. The patient and his/her family should be aware that this operation is not addressing the associated CM1 [ 56 , 57 ]; (5) the international experts were not aware of any evidence to support the use of the extradural section of the filum for either tethered cord syndrome or CM1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found strong consensus on this topic: (1) the association between CM1 and the “true” or “manifest” tethered cord is universally found to be very rare and occasional [ 53 ]; (2) in those rare instances where a tethered cord syndrome is present in CM1 subjects, a de-tethering procedure is successfully performed to cure the syndrome but does not produce effects on the CM1 [ 54 ]; (3) the occult tethered cord syndrome remains a controversial and questionable entity [ 55 ] and more than 80% of panelists questioned its existence; (4) in case of symptomatic tethered cord, an intradural section of the filum terminale is recommended. The patient and his/her family should be aware that this operation is not addressing the associated CM1 [ 56 , 57 ]; (5) the international experts were not aware of any evidence to support the use of the extradural section of the filum for either tethered cord syndrome or CM1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The co-morbid relationship between EDS and TCS remains ill-defined. TCS has been reported in patients with Chiari malformations type I (CM-I) [9,[19][20]. In a large study of 2,813 subjects with CM-I, 357 (12.7%) were diagnosed with hereditary disorders of connective tissue (HDCT), predominantly hEDS [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the literature includes few, and poorly documented, references that support the efficacy of filum terminale sectioning. A recent systematic review found only two published series of EDS-FT, both from the same group, and concluded that this procedure has no scientific support in CM-1 patients without evidence of tethered cord [55].…”
Section: Group 2a (Patients Previously Undergoing Section Of the Filu...mentioning
confidence: 99%