2014
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/aru125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of experimental design on the measurement of mate choice: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
146
3
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
8
146
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…female vs male choice) give different I PSI values and similar variation has been reported in previous studies233739. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the degree of reproductive isolation varies under different mating systems, and therefore, experimental designs3745. Therefore, determining the degree of reproductive isolation between host-populations of C. suppressalis requires clarification of the mating system of this species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…female vs male choice) give different I PSI values and similar variation has been reported in previous studies233739. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the degree of reproductive isolation varies under different mating systems, and therefore, experimental designs3745. Therefore, determining the degree of reproductive isolation between host-populations of C. suppressalis requires clarification of the mating system of this species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although short-term playback experiments have been invaluable in advancing our understanding of animal communication, lack of a response in those experiments may not always indicate an inability to discriminate or to respond appropriately over a longer time frame. As in tests of mate preference (see reviews by Edward 2014; Dougherty & Shuker 2015; Reinhold & Schielzeth 2015), response to short-term stimulus presentations can differ depending on time frame, social context, and many other elements of the experimental design. Long-term and indirect effects may be especially important with chemical signals which can retain some effect hours after deposition (e.g., MartĂ­n & LĂłpez 2013a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason a no-choice test is often used when measuring choosiness is because no-choice tests allow for the assessment of within-female baseline levels of attractiveness to a given male signal (Bailey & Zuk, 2012;Prosser, Murrary, & Cade, 1997). However, females generally show stronger discrimination in choice tests than they do in no-choice tests (Dougherty & Shuker, 2014). Therefore, future studies could benefit from the addition of variation in testing stimuli, thereby testing the three-way interaction between stimulus attractiveness, age and density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%