The Effect of Different Warm-up Protocols on young Soccer Players’ sprint

Alikhajeh, Yaser; Ramezanpour, Mohammad Reza; Moghaddam, Amir

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.308

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If these results are in concordance with those of Poprzęcki et al (2007), showing that rest interval of 5 or 15 min separating the warm-up from the onset of exercise did not affect either anaerobic power or acid base variables, other researchers showed that increasing the rest interval following warm-up causes a decreases in sprint performance (Alikhajeh et al 2011) and 200-m freestyle swimming (Zochowski et al 2007;West et al 2013). A too long rest interval causes decreases in core temperature which results in a 3% decrease in leg muscle power (Sargeant 1987).…”

supporting

confidence: 90%

Does post-warm-up rest interval affect the diurnal variation of 30-s Wingate cycle ergometry?

Chaâri

Frikha

Mezghanni

et al. 2015

Biological Rhythm Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the effects of rest interval following active warm-up (WU) durations on the diurnal variation of high-intensity cycling performance. Eleven male physical education students (22.6 ± 2.5 years; 179.2 ± 5.7 cm; 82.6 ± 9.6 kg; mean ± SD) participated in a cross-over randomized study, and they all underwent the 30-s Wingate test in the morning (08:00 h) and in the evening (18:00 h), after 5-min (WU 5 ) and 15-min (WU 15 ) warm-up durations, either with rest (WR), or without rest interval (NR) separating the WU at the onset of the high-intensity cycling exercise performance. The WU consisted of pedaling at a constant pace of 60 rpm against at 50% of the maximal aerobic power. The rest interval between the end of warm-up and the beginning of the anaerobic exercise was set at 5 min. Peak power (PP), mean power (MP), and the fatigue index (FI) were recorded. Likewise, heart rate, oral temperature (T), and rating of perceived exertion were registered at rest, at the end of the WU and just after the Wingate test. The ANOVA's showed no main effect of the rest interval on PP, MP, FI, and T parameters. However, significant interactions (WU duration × time-of-day and recovery condition × WU duration) were recorded on both PP and MP parameters. PP and MP were higher in the afternoon compared to the morning with gains of 4.4 and 3.6%, respectively. In the morning sessions, the WU 15 allows better improvement of muscular power, with either 0-or 5-min pre-exercise rest interval. However, in the afternoon sessions, both WU 15 and WU 5 durations allow better improvement of 30-s Wingate cycling performance in, respectively, WR and NR conditions. Therefore, athletes and coaches, as well as researchers, interested in high-intensity cycling exercise, should take into account the rest interval, the time-of-day, and the duration of warm-up when practicing, assessing, or interpreting data related to powerful lower limbs' muscles contractions activities.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 90%

Does post-warm-up rest interval affect the diurnal variation of 30-s Wingate cycle ergometry?

Chaâri

Frikha

Mezghanni

et al. 2015

Biological Rhythm Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similar results were obtained by Poprzęcki et al [14], showing that an interval of rest (5 or 15 min) separating the warm-up from the onset of exercise did not affect either anaerobic power or acid base variables. However, Alikhajeh et al [34] found that 5 min passive rest following a 10min dynamic warm-up was better than a period of 15 min for the improvement of sprint performance in young soccer players. In addition, several studies have demonstrated the effect of the post warm-up rest interval preceding a swimming performance: West et al [3] and Zochowski et al [7] demonstrated that both the rest intervals of 20 min and 10 min, respectively, were better than 45 min.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of warm-up duration and recovery interval prior to exercise on anaerobic performance

Frikha¹,

Chaâri²,

Mezghanni³

et al. 2016

Biol Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the study was to determine the impact of different active warm-up (AWU) durations and the rest interval separating it from exercise on anaerobic performance. Eleven male physical education students (22.6 ± 2.52 years; 179.2 ± 4.3 cm; 82.5 ± 9.7 kg; mean ± SD) participated in a cross-over randomized study, and they all underwent the Wingate test after three AWU durations: 5 min (AWU5), 15 min (AWU15) and 20 min (AWU20), with recovery (WREC) or without a recovery interval (NREC) separating the AWU and anaerobic exercise performance. All the AWUs consisted of pedalling at a constant pace of 60 rpm at 50% of the maximal aerobic power. The rest interval between the end of warm-up and the beginning of exercise was set at 5 min. During the Wingate test, peak power (PP), mean power (MP) and the fatigue index (FI) were recorded and analysed. Oral temperature was recorded at rest and at the end of the warm-up. Likewise, rest, post-warm-up and post-Wingate heart rate (HR) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded during each session. The ANOVA showed a significant effect of recovery interval, warm-up duration and measurement point on RPE scores (P<0.001). Although the effect of AWU duration on MP and PP was significant (P<0.05), the effect of the recovery interval on both parameters was not significant (P>0.05). Moreover, the analyses showed a significant interaction between recovery interval and AWU duration (P<0.001 and P<0.05 for MP and PP respectively). The AWU15 duration improves the MP and PP when associated with a recovery interval prior to exercise of 5 min. However, the AWU5 duration allows better improvement of power output when the exercise is applied immediately after the warm-up. Consequently, physically active males, as well as educators and researchers interested in anaerobic exercise, must take into account the duration of warm-up and the following recovery interval when practising or assessing activities requiring powerful lower limb muscle contractions.

show abstract

“…There are a number of variables that influence the ability of a warm-up to enhance performance, such as intensity, load, training age, biological age, and fiber type (Alikhajeh et al, 2011). The present study used recreationally trained individuals to investigate lower body isometric strength after various warm-up protocols.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Participating in a specific warm-up prior to a vigorous activity has been shown to enhance lower body strength and power (Alikhajeh et al,2011;Hamada et al, 2000;Ribeiro et al, 2014). However, if the intensity of the specific warmup is too low, it may not augment performance (Anderson, et al, 2014;Ribeiro et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To date, there are no standardized warm-up protocols prior to a maximal isometric power output. The literature reflects multiple combinations of time and exercise methods utilizing static, dynamic and WBV (Adams et al, 2009;Chmielewska et al, 2014;Dabbs et al, 2010;Dabbs et al, 2011;Dabbs et al, 2012;Dallas et al, 2014;García-López et al, 2012;Gerakaki et al, 2013;Kurt et al, 2014;Lamont et al, 2010;Marin et al, 2013;Rittweger et al, 2000;Ronnestad et al, 2012;Turner et al, 2011) making it important to further examine its applicability to improvements in the rate of force development (RFD), relative RFD (rRFD), ground reaction force (GRF) and relative ground reaction force (rGRF) during sport performance after warm-up exposure (Alikhajeh et al, 2011;Chmielewska et al, 2014;Cilli et al, 2014;Dabbs et al, 2010;Dabbs et al, 2011;Dallas et al, 2014;García-López et al, 2012;Marin et al, 2013;Rittweger et al, 2000;Ritzmann et al, 2013;Ronnestad et al, 2012;Thompson et al, 2013;Turner et al, 2011). As previously mentioned, utilizing a specific warm-up is highly recommended prior to any maximal effort lower body power activity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Influence of Whole Body Vibration and Specific Warm-ups on Force during an Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull

Cazas-Moreno

Gdovin²,

Williams³

et al. 2015

IJKSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of general and specific warm-up protocols on rate of force development (RFD), relative RFD (rRFD), ground reaction force (GRF) and relative ground reaction force (rGRF) during an isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), after WBV exposure. Methods: Fifteen healthy recreationally trained males (age: 24.1 ± 2.3 yrs, height: 72.9 ± 7.8 cm; mass: 86.9 ± 8.3) completed five protocols: baseline, isometric vibration (iVib), isometric no vibration (iNV), dynamic vibration (dVib) and dynamic no vibration (dNV). The baseline was completed without any warm-up prior to the IMTP. The intervention protocols had the same prescription of 4 sets of 30-second bouts of quarter squats (dynamic [DQS] and isometric [IQS]) on the WBV platform with or without vibration. Following a one-minute rest period after each protocol, participants completed three maximal IMTPs. Results: Repeated measures ANOVA with a Bonferroni post hoc demonstrated that RFD in dNV (7657.8 ± 2292.5 N/s) was significantly greater than iVib (7156.4 ± 2170.0 N/s). However, the other experimental trials for RFD demonstrated no significant differences (p>0.05). There were also no significant differences for rRFD, GRF or rGRF between protocols. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that a dynamic warm-up without WBV elicits greater RFD than an isometric warm-up with WBV prior to a maximal isometric exercise. Further research needs to be investigated utilizing dynamic and isometric warm-ups in conjunction with WBV and power output.

show abstract

The Effect of Different Warm-up Protocols on young Soccer Players’ sprint

Cited by 7 publications

References 12 publications

Does post-warm-up rest interval affect the diurnal variation of 30-s Wingate cycle ergometry?

Does post-warm-up rest interval affect the diurnal variation of 30-s Wingate cycle ergometry?

Influence of warm-up duration and recovery interval prior to exercise on anaerobic performance

Influence of Whole Body Vibration and Specific Warm-ups on Force during an Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About