2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10086-015-1516-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of depth and diameter of glued-in rods on pull-out connection strength of bamboo glulam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1), was 11.209 MPa. The similar shear strength value was obtained by Yan et al (2016), with the result of about 10.54 MPa. Table 1 lists the complete results of the pull-out resistance test for all varying edge distance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(1), was 11.209 MPa. The similar shear strength value was obtained by Yan et al (2016), with the result of about 10.54 MPa. Table 1 lists the complete results of the pull-out resistance test for all varying edge distance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Generally, Stepinac et al (2013) concluded that there are three main parameters involved in the above formula, e.g., the diameter of the glued-in rod, glued-in length and interfacial layer shear strength between wood and glue or between glue and rod. Similar to the conclusion above, Stepinac et al (2013) and Yan et al (2016) formulated the Eq. (1):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the shape of bamboo is that of an irregular thin-walled elliptical cone tube, which has low carrying capacity and large discreteness of mechanical properties, making it difficult to meet the structural requirements of many engineering structures [10,11]. To make more effective use of bamboo, many engineering bamboo materials, such as bamboo scrimber [12], laminated bamboo [13] and bamboo glulam [14,15], have been developed, studied and utilized. Existing research shows that using bamboo engineering materials as flexural members have some unfavorable aspects, such as low section stiffness and insufficient bearing and spanning capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%