The International Conference on Information Network 2012 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icoin.2012.6164447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of decentralized resource allocation in network-centric warfare

Abstract: We propose a decentralized combat model for the network-centric warfare. The troops (military units or weapon platforms) of Green (friendly) forces perform their own threat evaluation, decision making, and weapon allocation in order to encounter enemy forces. Although they cooperate with each other for the operational success, their dynamic behavior can be modeled by a set of decentralized optimization problems where each force adopts its best strategy of weapon allocation according to the assessed threat. Ado… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the existing literature of decentralized learning are focused on the standard loss minimization formulation [41,43], i.e., min x∈R 𝑑 𝑓 (x), where 𝑓 (β€’) is the objective loss function and x denotes the global model parameters to be learned, and 𝑑 is the model dimension. In the literature, a wide range of machine learning applications can be modeled by the standard decentralized loss minimization formulation (e.g., robotic network [15,32], network resource allocation [12,36], power networks [2,7]). Some recent works, [20,21,25,44] studied decentralized min-max optimization problems, i.e., min x∈R 𝑑 1 max y∈R 𝑑 2 𝑓 (x, y), which are a special case (with same outer and inner level objective) of bilevel optimization problems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the existing literature of decentralized learning are focused on the standard loss minimization formulation [41,43], i.e., min x∈R 𝑑 𝑓 (x), where 𝑓 (β€’) is the objective loss function and x denotes the global model parameters to be learned, and 𝑑 is the model dimension. In the literature, a wide range of machine learning applications can be modeled by the standard decentralized loss minimization formulation (e.g., robotic network [15,32], network resource allocation [12,36], power networks [2,7]). Some recent works, [20,21,25,44] studied decentralized min-max optimization problems, i.e., min x∈R 𝑑 1 max y∈R 𝑑 2 𝑓 (x, y), which are a special case (with same outer and inner level objective) of bilevel optimization problems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These real-world limitations have spawned the rapid development of decentralized learning over edge networks in recent years, which can leverage highly flexible peer-to-peer edge computing networks with arbitrary topologies Nedic and Ozdaglar [2009], Lian et al [2017]. Also, thanks to the resilience to single-pointof-failure, data privacy, and simple implementations, decentralized learning has attracted growing interest recently, and has found various science and engineering applications, such as distributedrobotics control Ren et al [2007], Zhou and Roumeliotis [2011] and network resource allocation Jiang et al [2018], Rhee et al [2012], such as dictionary learning Chen et al [2014], multi-agent systems Cao et al [2012], Zhou and Roumeliotis [2011], multi-task learning Wang et al [2018], Zhang et al [2019], and information retrieval Ali and Van Stam [2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The completion of missions often requires detailed decomposition and interpretation, and is broken down into a series of specific tasks or subtasks to perform [23]. In [24], a distributed decision-making capability resulting in near-optimal weapon-target assignments for formations of unmanned combat vehicles was proposed. The decision-making is based on a modified version of the cross-entropy method distributed over the formations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%