Introduction: Radiofrequency (RF) and cryoablation are routinely used to treat arrhythmias, but the extent and time course of edema associated with the two different modalities is unknown. Our goal was to follow the lesion maturation and edema formation after RF and cryoablation using serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Methods and Results: Ventricular ablation was performed in a canine model (n = 11) using a cryo or an irrigated RF catheter. T2-weighted (T2w) edema imaging and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-MRI were done immediately (0 day: acute), 1 to 2 weeks (subacute), and 8 to 12 weeks (chronic) after ablation. After the final MRI, excised hearts underwent pathological evaluation. As a result, 45 ventricular lesions (cryo group: 20; RF group: 25) were evaluated. Acute LGE volume was not significantly different but acute edema volume in cryo group was significantly smaller (1225.0 ± 263.5 vs 1855.2 ± 520.5 mm 3 ; P = 0.01). One week after ablation, edema still existed in both group but was similar in size. Two weeks after ablation there was no edema in either of the groups. In the chronic phase, the lesion volume for cryo and RF in LGE-MRI (296.7 ± 156.4 vs 281.6 ± 140.8 mm 3 ; P = 0.73); and pathology (243.3 ± 125.9 vs 214.5 ± 148.6 mm 3 ; P = 0.49), as well as depth, was comparable.Conclusions: When comparing cryo and RF lesions of similar chronic size, acute edema is larger for RF lesions. Edema resolves in both cryo and RF lesions in 1 to 2 weeks. K E Y W O R D S catheter ablation, cryoablation, late gadolinium enhancement, magnetic resonance imaging, radiofrequency 1 | INTRODUCTION Cryo and radiofrequency (RF) ablations are routinely used to treat cardiac arrhythmias. 1 Ablation success depends on creating durable lesions. Despite best efforts, arrhythmia recurrence following catheter ablation is commonly observed. 2,3 Prior studies have shown that there can be a significant edema formation during ablation 4 and some of the recurrences has been attributed to the creation of this edema and as a J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:255-262. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jce © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | 255
O R I G I N A L A R T I C L Eresult, reversible block. 5 Deeper and bigger lesions can be made by using higher contact force, but higher contact force is also associated with more complications like steam pops as well as edema. 6,7 We have also recently reported the large extent of edema that is associated with RF ablation and that it resolves over the span of few weeks. 8 However, the differences between the creation and timeline of edema associated with cryo vs RF are still unknown.Late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) has been used to estimate myocardial scar after catheter ablation and T2-weighted (T2w) MRI has been used to estimate edema. [9][10][11] Our goal in this study was to study the timeline and differences between edema and lesion maturation between cryo and RF ablation by using serial MRI for acute and chronic ablation lesions of similar size.