2005
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m1839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Computerized Provider Order Entry on Medical Student Clerkship Experiences

Abstract: Hospitals need to ensure that the educational potential of medical students' clinical experiences is maximized when implementing CPOE.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students desire training and the ability to practice and receive feedback on EHR. 15,16 Despite these findings, less than half of medical schools have written policies regarding student documentation in the electronic records.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students desire training and the ability to practice and receive feedback on EHR. 15,16 Despite these findings, less than half of medical schools have written policies regarding student documentation in the electronic records.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Inquiry API can be generated automatically, whenever the system displays a record entry that has been correlated to others resources, e.g., by means of an explicit hyperlink, or that is related to a medical handbook or local glossary, as in the case of abbreviations and acronyms. In this case, Inquiry API can help avoid and limit medication and transcription errors (Eslami et al 2008), as well as increase practitioners' access to educational materials (Rosenbloom et al 2005) and improve learning and knowledge retention (Knight et al 2005). Irrespectively of who or what creates it, Inquiry API is conceived to make practitioners aware of additional data that could help them interpret a specific inscription, in order to leverage what has been called redundancy by supplementary data (Cabitza et al 2005).…”
Section: Inquiry Apimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In doing so, clinicians can imply a linkage between entries of the patient record that can be as precise or ambiguous as needed [13]. Irrespectively of who or what creates Inquiry AP/KEI, this is conceived to make practitioners aware of additional data that could help them interpret a specific inscription, in order to leverage what has been called redundancy by supplementary data [12]; this positive redundancy is created in documents to facilitate practitioners' access to educational materials [38], improve their knowledge retention [28] and the learning of the specific notions and conventions that characterize a community of practice [46,16].…”
Section: Ap/kei For Context Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%