2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of antimicrobial growth promoter withdrawal on the health of weaned pigs in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Escherichia coli infections can be the most common reason of piglet diseases (Laine et al, 2004). Although Marounek et al (2003) observed a strong antimicrobial activity of caprylic acid and, to a lesser extent, capric acid against E. coli, no lowering effect of MCFA on the population of this bacterium was found in the current experiment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Escherichia coli infections can be the most common reason of piglet diseases (Laine et al, 2004). Although Marounek et al (2003) observed a strong antimicrobial activity of caprylic acid and, to a lesser extent, capric acid against E. coli, no lowering effect of MCFA on the population of this bacterium was found in the current experiment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…24 In Finland, antimicrobials used for the treatment of diarrhea in weaning pigs did not increase significantly after a ban on AGP use in 1999. 25 In Norway, a significant reduction in the consumption of antimicrobials for therapeutic indications followed a ban on AGP use. 26 However, in Sweden, a ban on AGP use in 1986 was followed by an increase in the consumption of antimicrobials for therapeutic indications, with antimicrobial consumption returning to the same level as before the ban on AGP use after almost 10 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matter of feed restriction is controversial since low feed intake may cause intestinal malfunction and damage (Spreeuwenberg et al, 2001;McCracken et al, 1999), but despite this, restricted feeding is commonly used as an approach to reduce weaning diarrhoea in Denmark (Jørgensen et al, 2000) and elsewhere (Lainea et al, 2004). Potentially, restrictive feeding may prevent piglets, which have not eaten significant amounts during the first one to two stressful days, to engorge on the weaning diet if it is available ad-lib.…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 99%