2021
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of 5‐min mindfulness of love on suffering and spiritual quality of life of palliative care patients: A randomized controlled study

Abstract: Objective Suffering is a common experience in palliative care. In our study, we aimed to determine the effect of 5‐min mindfulness of love on suffering and the spiritual quality of life of palliative care patients. Methods We conducted a parallel‐group, blinded, randomized controlled study at the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), Malaysia from February 2019 to April 2019. Sixty adult palliative care patients with an overall suffering score of 4/10 or above based on the Suffering Pictogram were recrui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no significant difference in the peace subscale between the MBI group and the control group. 8 In Lim et al's, 9 in the MBI group, vs control group, there were improvements in the overall suffering score (P < .001), the total suffering score (P = .007), and the spiritual QOL (P < .001). The latter was due to greater reductions in worry (P = .027), anger (P = .047), non-acceptance (P = .018), and emptiness (P = .047).…”
Section: Results Of Individual Studiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was no significant difference in the peace subscale between the MBI group and the control group. 8 In Lim et al's, 9 in the MBI group, vs control group, there were improvements in the overall suffering score (P < .001), the total suffering score (P = .007), and the spiritual QOL (P < .001). The latter was due to greater reductions in worry (P = .027), anger (P = .047), non-acceptance (P = .018), and emptiness (P = .047).…”
Section: Results Of Individual Studiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The overall risk of bias was low to moderate (see Figure 2). The allocation sequence of the studies was considered of low risk, as the randomization was done by either using computergenerated random numbers, [6][7][8][9] minimization randomization, 10 or blocked randomization. 3,11 Teo et al 12 had 2 different randomization processes: blocked randomization for the intervention and sequenced opaque envelopes for the waitlist control condition.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias In Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the supportive listening sessions, the doctors interviewed patients with the same open-ended questions as in box 1, listened to patients attentively, without judgement or interruption, and acknowledged patient distress when it was appropriate. Supportive listening was set as a control group because 5–20 min of supportive listening has been shown to reduce suffering among palliative care patients 16 19 22 23. The instructions on delivering the supportive listening session are presented in box 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mindfulness-based interventions, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, have been shown to improve pain, stress, anxiety, depression and insomnia 11–15. In the palliative care setting, brief mindfulness exercises lasting 5–20 min have been studied and found to reduce stress, distress, suffering, dyspnoea, anxiety, depression and spiritual distress 16–23…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%