2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10103558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Economic Feasibility of Passive Houses in Korea

Abstract: The number of passive houses and zero-energy buildings being developed is increasing, as measures to reduce the rapidly increasing building energy consumption. While government building policies focus on energy savings, investors and the building market emphasize the initial investment cost. These conflicting perspectives obstruct the development of passive houses in the building market. In this study, a series of building energy analyses, including the effect of energy saving measures and economic information… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30%). This has also been found in other countries with limited resources [34][35][36]. However, in the current market there is a wide variety of increasingly affordable insulation materials with low thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…30%). This has also been found in other countries with limited resources [34][35][36]. However, in the current market there is a wide variety of increasingly affordable insulation materials with low thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In Korea, authors focused on zero energy buildings have studied passive houses. Shim confirmed the economic feasibility of passive houses in Korea [4]. Authors who have proposed passive house alternatives show a short payback period and positive life cycle cost (LCC) results compared to the reference building's life cycle period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The simulation was carried out for six months from November to April-the heating period in Korea. The set-point temperature of indoor was set to 22 ℃, according to the Energy Saving Design Standards for Buildings in Korea [30] Tables 4 and 5.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation was carried out for six months from November to April-the heating period in Korea. The set-point temperature of indoor was set to 22°C, according to the Energy Saving Design Standards for Buildings in Korea [30] Tables 4 and 5. Analyzed cases -Case 1-1 : before retrofit and based on the walk-through audit data -Case 1-2 : before retrofit and based on the detailed measurement data -Case 2 : after retrofit based on the detailed measurement data Table 5.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%