The Ecolead ICT Infrastructure For Collaborative Networked Organizations

Rabelo, Ricardo J.; Gusmeroli, Sergio; Arana, Cristina; Nagellen, Thierry

doi:10.1007/978-0-387-38269-2_47

Cited by 32 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Indeed, the purpose of the ecosystem is to provide infrastructure, tools and vocabulary for independent entities (people, organisations, collaborations) to create new collaborations, utilising the already existing services from the ecosystem. This is in contrast to a common goal in related work (e.g., ECOLEAD (Rabelo, Gusmeroli, Arana, & Nagellen, 2006), CrossWork (Mehandjiev & Grefen, 2010)) for creating a shared space with a shared incentives of the members. In open service ecosystems the initiators of collaborations each have their private incentives and conflicts of interest are to be expected, and resolution of such conflicts need to be supported.…”

Section: Open Service Ecosystemmentioning

confidence: 95%

Framework for Managing Features of Open Service Ecosystems

Ruokolainen

Kutvonen

2012

Handbook of Research on Service-Oriented Systems and Non-Functional Properties

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The recent increased use of Internet, social media, and networked business mark a development trend where software-based services flow to the open market for enabling service-oriented networked business. Our vision is that in future, organizations and individuals collaborate within open service ecosystems. An open service ecosystem is characterized especially by the autonomy of its entities, its evolution with respect to available services and collaboration types, and dynamic establishment of collaborations. For facilitating collaboration establishment in open service ecosystems features of services and cooperation facilities, and feature inter-dependencies need to be governed rigorously. Towards this purpose we have established a framework for unambiguous description of service ecosystem features. The framework comprises a conceptual model which provides especially a categorization of features, and a formalization of the conceptual model as a meta-model for service ecosystems. We show that the corresponding feature categories have their specific roles and semantics as part of different ecosystem elements and in different phases of service ecosystem processes.

show abstract

Section: Open Service Ecosystemmentioning

confidence: 95%

Framework for Managing Features of Open Service Ecosystems

Ruokolainen

Kutvonen

2012

Handbook of Research on Service-Oriented Systems and Non-Functional Properties

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…TuBE operates in an open service market unbound by pre-contracts; the openness sets more strict requirements for trust management. The ECOLEAD project [18] aims to build infrastructure services such as billing, tools for human collaboration and federated executing of joint workflow descriptions.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Making Multi-Dimensional Trust Decisions on Inter-Enterprise Collaborations

Ruohomaa

Kutvonen

2008

2008 Third International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Enterprise computing is moving towards more open, collaborative systems. Joining a business network must be made efficient, despite the technical and semantic interoperability challenges involved in connecting different information and communication systems. Trust or lack thereof forms a pragmatic challenge: partners must continuously evaluate whether they trust each other enough to collaborate in the face of risk. Supporting technology is needed for making trust-based decisions on routine business transactions and observing the business peers for malicious or incorrect behaviour on interactions. We present a trust model for automating routine decision-making which considers both risk probabilities and tolerance valuations in the enterprise, and is dynamically updated based on new experience gathered both locally and from third parties.

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, although this approach had a considerable evolution in the last decade, there still exist bottlenecks that act as inhibitors for a larger scale adoption of Service Oriented Architectures (SOA) in the CN context [1,2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pro-activity in Collaborative Service Ecosystems

Cardoso¹,

Camarinha-Matos²

2011

Adaptation and Value Creating Collaborative Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Service Orientation has been an extensively used approach to model the services Collaborative Networks' (CN) members are willing to provide to customers. The evolution of this paradigm has followed an improvement path since its early forms. Nevertheless bottlenecks still exist, namely in what concerns: 1) a gap between the business and the information and communication technology perspectives; 2) an adequate Quality of Service (QoS) assessment mechanism for the CN context. As a contribution to these issues, this paper proposes: 1) the creation of a collaborative Service Ecosystem, introducing pro-activeness elements towards an auto-initiative representation of CN member's services; 2) the introduction of a QoS mechanism needed to facilitate the assessment of services in a CN context.

show abstract

The Ecolead ICT Infrastructure For Collaborative Networked Organizations

Cited by 32 publications

References 7 publications

Framework for Managing Features of Open Service Ecosystems

Framework for Managing Features of Open Service Ecosystems

Making Multi-Dimensional Trust Decisions on Inter-Enterprise Collaborations

Pro-activity in Collaborative Service Ecosystems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About